Inclusion, School Restructuring, and the Remaking of American Society

References

1. Administrative policy on full inclusion. (1991). Santa Fe: New Mexico Department of Education.
2. Affleck, J. Q., Madge, S., Adams, A., & Lowenbraun, S. (1988). Integrated classroom resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children, 54, 339-348.Integrated classroom resource model: Academic viability and effectiveness. Exceptional Children 54:339–348.
3. Artick, J., Krug, D., Falco, R., Jackson, P., Anderson, N., & Brazeau, K. (n.d.). Supported education in Oregon summary of findings: Elementary school report. Portland, OR: Portland State University.Supported education in Oregon summary of findings: Elementary school report.
4. Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33–35.The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership 52:33–35.
5. Barton, L., & Landsman, M. (1993). The politics of integration: Observations on the Warnock Report. In R. Slee (Ed.), Is there a desk mith my name on it'? The politics of integration (pp. 41-49). London: Falmer Press.Is there a desk mith my name on it'? The politics of integration, pp 41–49.
6. Beyond normal: Will our children learn to value diverse community members? (1993). Inclusive Education in Minnesota: What's Working? 4–5.
7. Biklen, D. (1992). Schooling without labels: Parents, educators, and inclusive education. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Schooling without labels: Parents, educators, and inclusive education.
8. Burello, L. C., & Wright, P. T. (Eds.). (1993). Strategies for inclusion of behaviorally challenged students. Principal Letters, 10.Strategies for inclusion of behaviorally challenged students. Principal Letters 10.
9. Chase, V., & Pope, E. (1993, February 24). Model for mainstreaming: The synergistic approach. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities of America Conference, San Francisco.
10. Christmas, O. L. (1992). The 1992 Michigan non-mandated aide pilot project. Lansing: Michigan Department of Education.The 1992 Michigan non-mandated aide pilot project.
11. Cloud, S., Jr. (1995, January 16). New national mood divides Americans, Daily News, p. 23.
12. Cohen, M. D, (1994). Overcoming barriers to the inclusion of children with disabilities in the local schools: A blueprint for change. Springfield: Illinois Planning Council on Developmental Disabilities.
13. Creating schools for all of our students: What 12 schools have to say. (1994). Reston, VA. Council for Exceptional Children.
14. Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education, El Paso Independent School District, 874 F. 2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
15. Deno, S., Murayama, G., Espin, C., & Cohen, C. (1990). Educating students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Minnesota alternatives. Exceptional Children, 57, 150-161.Educating students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms: Minnesota alternatives. Exceptional Children 57:150–161.
16. Does inclusion cost more? (1994). Inclusive Educatian Programs, 1(5), 4-5.
17. Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy 9(5), 26-31.Some schools work and more can. Social Policy 9:26–31.
18. Ferguson, D. L. (1992). Regular Class Participation System (RCPS): A final report. Eugene: University of Oregon.Regular Class Participation System (RCPS): A final report.
19. Ferguson, D. L., Meyer, G., Jeanchild, L., Juniper, L., & Zingo, J. (1992). Figuring out what to do with the grownups: How teachers make inclusion "work" for students with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 218–226.Figuring out what to do with the grownups: How teachers make inclusion "work" for students with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 17:218–226.
20. Final report of the Inclusive Education Recommendation Committee: Findings and recommendations. (1993). Lansing: Michigan Department of Education.
21. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294–309.Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children 60:294–309.
22. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995). Sometimes separate is better. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 22-26.Sometimes separate is better. Educational Leadership 52:22–26.
23. Funk, R. (1987). Disability rights: From caste to class in the context of civil rights. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 7-30). New York: Praeger.Disability rights: From caste to class in the context of civil rights. Images of the disabled, disabling images, 7–30.
24. Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D. K. (1987). Beyond separate education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367-395.Beyond separate education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review 57:367–395.
25. Gates, H. L., Jr. (1994, March 27). A liberalism of heart and spine. New York Times, p. A23.
26. Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S., Cloniger, C., & Dennis, R. (1992). My child has a classmate with severe disabilities: What parents of nondisabled children think about full inclusion. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 20(2), 1–12.My child has a classmate with severe disabilities: What parents of nondisabled children think about full inclusion. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin 20:1–12.
27. Gilhool, T. K. (1989). The right to an effective education: From Brown to PL 94-142 and beyond. In D. K. Lipsky & A. Gartner (Eds.), Beyond separate education: Quality education, for all (pp. 243-253). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.The right to an effective education: From Brown to PL 94-142 and beyond. Beyond separate education: Quality education, for all, 243–253.
28. Granger, L., & Granger, B. (1986). The magic feather. New York: E. P. Dutton.The magic feather.
29. Greer v. Rome City School 950 F. 2d 688 (11th Cir. 1991).
30. Guidelines far implementatian of the Least Restrictive Environment provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Indiana's Article 7. (1994). Indianapolis, IN: LRE Statewide Task Force.
31. Hahn, H. (1994). New trends in disability studies: Implications for educational policy. Paper prepared for the National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion Invitational Conference on Inclusive Education. Racine, WI: Wingspread Conference Center.
32. Haigh, J. A., & Malever, M. C. (1993-1994). Special education referral practices by gender, ethnicity, and comparison to state and district enrollments, CASE in Point, 8(1), 13-24.Special education referral practices by gender, ethnicity, and comparison to state and district enrollments. CASE in Point 8:13–24.
33. Hasazi, S., Furney, K. S., & Johnstone, A. P. (1994). A study of the implementatian of Vermont's Act 230. Unpublished manuscript.
34. Helmstetter, E., Peck, C. A., & Giangreco, M. F. (1994). Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate or severe disabilities: A statewide survey of high school students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 263–276.Outcomes of interactions with peers with moderate or severe disabilities: A statewide survey of high school students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 19:263–276.
35. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: The reshaping of American life by differences in intelligence. New York: Free Press.The bell curve: The reshaping of American life by differences in intelligence.
36. Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement on students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.Evaluating the effects of placement on students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 19:200–214.
37. Include disabled in standards, special ed advocates insist. (1994). Research Report on Education Research, 26(9), 3.
38. Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, L. M., & Troutner, R. E. (1994). Accommodations for individual differences within classroom ability groups. Exceptional Children, 60, 344–358.Accommodations for individual differences within classroom ability groups. Exceptional Children 60:344–358.
39. Kauffman, J. M. (1993). How to achieve radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 6-16.How to achieve radical reform of special education. Exceptional Children 60:6–16.
40. Kauffman, J. M. (1994). Two perspectives on inclusion: One size does not fit all. Beyond Behavior, 5, 11–14.Two perspectives on inclusion: One size does not fit all. Beyond Behavior 5:11–14.
41. KERA program outline: Inclusion of students with disabilities in general education settings. (1994). Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Education.
42. Kirkpatrick, P. (1994). Triple jeopardy: Disability, race, and poverty in America, Poverty and Race, 3(3), 1–2, 8.Triple jeopardy: Disability, race, and poverty in America. Poverty and Race 3:1–2, 8.
43. Kishi, C. S., & Meyer, L. H. (1994). What children report and remember: A six-year follow-up on the effects of social contact between peers with and without disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 277–289.
44. Kohler, P. D. (1993). Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 20(5), 107–121.Best practices in transition: Substantiated or implied? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 20:107–121.
45. Kohler, P. D. (1994). Serving students with disabilities in pastsecondary education settings: A conceptual framework of program outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
46. Laski, F. (1994). On the 40th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education: Footnotes for the historically impaired. TASH Newsletter, 20(5), 3-4.On the 40th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education: Footnotes for the historically impaired. TASH Newsletter 20:3–4.
47. Limited programs bar choices for disabled students. (1995, January 13). Education Daily, pp. 1, 3.
48. Macchiarola, F. J., Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1996). The judicial system and equity of schooling. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 23, 567-606.The judicial system and equity of schooling. Fordham Urban Law Journal 23:567–606.
49. Marder, C., & D'Amico, R. (1992). How well are youth with disabilities really doing? A comparison of youth with disabilities and youth in general. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.How well are youth with disabilities really doing? A comparison of youth with disabilities and youth in general.
50. Marwell, B. E. (1990). Integratian of students with mental retardation. Madison, WI: Madison Public Schools.Integratian of students with mental retardation.
51. McDonnell, A., McDonnell, J., Hardman, M., & McCone, G. (1991). Educating students with severe disabilities in their neighborhood school: The Utah elementary model. Remedial and Special Educatian, 12(6), 34–45.Educating students with severe disabilities in their neighborhood school: The Utah elementary model. Remedial and Special Educatian 12:34–45.
52. McLaughlin, M. J., & Warren, S. H. (1994). Issues and options in restructuring schools and special education programs. College Park: University of Maryland.Issues and options in restructuring schools and special education programs.
53. Minow, M. (1990). Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Making all the difference: Inclusion, exclusion, and American law.
54. Morra, L. G. (1994). Special education reform: Districts grapple with inclusion programs. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.Special education reform: Districts grapple with inclusion programs.
55. Morris, J. (1990). Progress with humanity? The experience of a disabled lecturer. In R. Rieser & M. Mason (Edt.), Disability, equality in the classroom: A human rights issue, London: ILEA.
56. National study of inclusive education. (1994). New York: City University of New York, Graduate School and University Center, National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion.
57. National study of inclusive education. (1995). New York: City University of New York, Graduate School and University Center, National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion.
58. Nisbet, J. (1994). Educational reform: Summary and recommendations. The national reform agenda and people with mental retardation: Putting people first (pp. 151-165). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
59. Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District 995 F.29 1204 (3rd Cir. 1993).
60. O'Neil, J. (1994-1995). Can inclusion work? A conversation with Jim Kauffman and Mara Sapon-Shevin. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 7-10.Can inclusion work? A conversation with Jim Kauffman and Mara Sapon-Shevin. Educational Leadership 52:7–10.
61. Parents, advocates rail against schools that thwart education and inclusion. (1994). Inclusive Education Programs, 1(12), 2–3.
62. Parrish, T. B. (1994). Removing incentives for restrictive placements (Policy Paper No. 4). Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research, Center for Special Education Finance.
63. Persons with disabilities lag behind other Americans in employment, education, and income. (1994). Washington, DC: National Organization on Disability.
64. Peterson v. Hastings (Neb.) Public Schools (Neb. 1994).
65. Peterson ruling raises troubling questions on ADA. (1994). Special Educator, 10(4), 49, 59-60.
66. Position statement on inclusive education. (1992). Lansing: Michigan State Board of Education.
67. Ramsay, E. (1993). Foreword. In R. Slee (Ed.), Is there a desk with my name on it? The politics of integration (pp. viii-ix). London: Falmer Press.Foreword. Is there a desk with my name on it? The politics of integration.
68. Ray, B. M. (1985). Measuring the social position of the mainstreamed handicapped child. Exceptional Children, 52(4), 57–62.Measuring the social position of the mainstreamed handicapped child. Exceptional Children 52:57–62.
69. Richardson, L. (1994, April 6). Minority students languish in special education system. New York Times, pp. A1, B7.
70. Roach, V. (1995). Winning ways: Creating inclusive schools, classrooms, and communities. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Boards of Education.Winning ways: Creating inclusive schools, classrooms, and communities.
71. Rossman, G. B., & Anthony, P. G. (1992). Restructuring from within: The Massachusetts experiment with integrating all students in the classroom. Unpublished manuscript.
72. Rowley V. Board of Education, 458 U.S. 175, 1982.
73. Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel Holland No. 92-15608 (9th Cir. 1994).
74. The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education: World conference on special needs education. Access and equality. (1994). New York: UNESCO.
75. Separate and unequal. (1993, December 13). U.S. News & World Report, pp. 46-60.
76. Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1995). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
77. Shanker, A. (1994). Full inclusion is neither free nor appropriate. Educational Leadership, 52, 18–21.Full inclusion is neither free nor appropriate. Educational Leadership 52:18–21.
78. Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1994). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
79. Sklaroff, S. (1994, April 20). Goals 2000 seen spurring "Inclusion" movement. Education Week, p. 5.
80. Skrtic, T. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148–207.The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review 61:148–207.
81. Skrtic, T. M., & Sailor, W. (1993). Barriers and bridges to inclusive education: An analysis of Louisiana special education policy. Lawrence: Kansas University Affiliated Program.Barriers and bridges to inclusive education: An analysis of Louisiana special education policy.
82. Slee, R. (Ed.). (1993). Is there a desk with my name on it? The politics of integration. London: Falmer Press.Is there a desk with my name on it? The politics of integration.
83. Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American journal of Psychology 15:201–293.
84. Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (Eds.). (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classroom: Facilitating learning for all students. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.Curriculum considerations in inclusive classroom: Facilitating learning for all students.
85. State special education outcomes, 1993. (1994). Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes.
86. Staub, D., & Peck, C. A. (1994). What are the outcomes for nondisabled students? Educational Leadership, 52(4), 36–40.What are the outcomes for nondisabled students? Educational Leadership 52:36–40.
87. Sternberg, R. J. (1994). For whom does The Bell Curve toll? It tolls for you. Unpublished manuscript.
88. Study: Laws guarantee school choice for disabled. (1995, January 24). Education Daily, p. 3.
89. Taylor, S. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 41-53.Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps 13:41–53.
90. Teachers union president calls inclusion "fad". (1994). Special Educator, 9, 173-174.
91. The transition experiences of young people with disabilities. (1993). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
92. Vermont's Act 230: Three years later. A report on the impact of Act 230. (1993). Montpelier: Vermont Department of Education.
93. Verstegen, D. A. (1994). Fiscal provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Historical overview. Palo Alto, CA: Center for Special Education Finance.Fiscal provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Historical overview.
94. Villa, R., Thousand, J. S., Meyers, J., & Nevin, A. (1993). Regular and special education teachers and administrator perceptions of heterageneous education. Unpublished manuscript.
95. Wagner, M. (1989). The transition experiences of youth with disabilities: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
96. Wagner, M. (1992, April). Being female – A secondary disability? Gender differences in the transition experiences of young people with disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
97. Walker, L. (1987). Procedural rights in the wrong system: Special education is not enough. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled, disabling images (pp. 97-116). New York: Praeger.Procedural rights in the wrong system: Special education is not enough. Images of the disabled, disabling images, 97–116.
98. Weinstein, D. F. (1993-1994). Special education referral and classification practices by gender, family status and terms used: A case study. CASE in Point, 8(1), 25-36.Special education referral and classification practices by gender, family status and terms used: A case study. CASE in Point 8:25–36.
99. Williams, W., Fox, T. J., Thousand, J., & Fox, W. (1990). Level of acceptance and implementation of best practices in the education of students with severe handicaps in Vermont. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 14(1), 120-131.Level of acceptance and implementation of best practices in the education of students with severe handicaps in Vermont. Education and Training in Mental Retardation 14:120–131.
100. Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. (1992). Washington, DC: National Association of State Boards of Education.
101. York, J., Vandercook, T., MacDonald, C, Heise-Neff, C, & Caughney, F. (1992). Feedback about integrating middle-school students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Exceptional Children, 58, 244-258.Feedback about integrating middle-school students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Exceptional Children 58:244–258.
102. Ysseldyke, J. (1987). Classification of handicapped students. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice, Vol. 1. Learner characteristics and adaptive education (pp. 253-272). New York: Pergamon Press.