What Do We Know (and Need to Know) about the Impact of School Choice Reforms on Disadvantaged Students?

References

1. Arum, R. (1996). Do private schools force public schools to compete? American Sociological Review, 61(1), 29–46.Do private schools force public schools to compete? American Sociological Review 61:29–46.
2. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1997). Teacher pay and teacher quality. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn.Teacher pay and teacher quality.
3. Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on America's public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud and the attack on America's public schools.
4. Bettinger, E. (1999). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools (Occasional Paper No. 4, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Available at http:// www.ncspe.org/
5. Black, S. E. (1999). Do better schools matter? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 577–599.Do better schools matter? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114:577–599.
6. Blank, R. K. (1990). Educational effects of magnet high schools. In W. Clune & J. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (pp. 77–109). New York: Falmer Press.Educational effects of magnet high schools. Choice and control in American education, 77–109.
7. Bogart, W. T., & Cromwell, B. A. (2000). How much is a neighborhood school worth? Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 280–305.How much is a neighborhood school worth? Journal of Urban Economics 47:280–305.
8. Bryk, A., Lee, V., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Catholic schools and the common good.
9. Center for Education Reform. (2000). Charter school highlights and statistics [On-line]. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://www.edreform.com/pubs/chglance.htm
10. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Politics, markets, and America's schools.
11. Clotfelter, C. (1975). The effect of school desegregation on housing prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 57, 446–451.The effect of school desegregation on housing prices. Review of Economics and Statistics 57:446–451.
12. Clotfelter, C. (1976). School desegregation, "tipping," and private school enrollment. Journal of Human Resources, 7, 29–50.School desegregation, "tipping," and private school enrollment. Journal of Human Resources 7:29–50.
13. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.Public and private high schools: The impact of communities.
14. Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1981). Public and private schools. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
15. Coles, A. D. (1998, September 9). Poll finds Americans split over public funding of private education. Education Week, p. 6.
16. Colwell, P. K., & Guntermann, K. (1984). The value of neighborhood schools. Economics of Education Review, 3, 177–182.The value of neighborhood schools. Economics of Education Review 3:177–182.
17. Couch, J. F., Shughart, W. F., & Williams, A. L. (1993). Private school enrollment and public school performance. Public Choice, 76, 301–312.Private school enrollment and public school performance. Public Choice 76:301–312.
18. Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2000). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: An analysis of the Chicago public schools (NBER Working Paper No. 7888). Available at http://papers.nber.org/papers/w7888
19. Dee, T. S. (1998). Competition and the quality of public schools. Economics of Education Review, 17, 419–427.Competition and the quality of public schools. Economics of Education Review 17:419–427.
20. Doolittle, F. (1999). Designing education voucher experiments: Recommendations for researchers, funders, and users. Paper presented at the Setting the Agenda Conference, National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
21. Eide, E., Goldhaber, D., & Showalter, M. (2000). Does private high school attendance lead to attendance at more selective colleges? Unpublished manuscript.
22. Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 10, 941–974.Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference? Quarterly Journal of Economics 10:941–974.
23. Figlio, D. N., & Stone, J. A. (1999). School choice and student performance: Are private schools really better? (Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper No. 1141-97). University of Wisconsin-Madison, September 1997.
24. Goldberger, A. S., & Cain, G. C. (1982). The causal analysis of cognitive outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore report. Sociology of Education, 55, 103–122.
25. Goldhaber, D. D. (2001). The interface between public and private schooling: Market pressure and the impact on performance. In D. Monk, H. J. Walberg, & M. Wang (Eds.), Improving educational productivity (pp. 47–75). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.The interface between public and private schooling: Market pressure and the impact on performance. Improving educational productivity, 47–75.
26. Goldhaber, D. D., Brewer, D. J., Eide, E. R., & Rees, D. I. (1999). Testing for sample selection in the Milwaukee school choice experiment. Economics of Education Review, 18, 259–267.Testing for sample selection in the Milwaukee school choice experiment. Economics of Education Review 18:259–267.
27. Goldhaber, D. D., & Eide, E. R. (2000, April). Methodological thoughts on measuring the impact of competition in the educational workplace. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
28. Greene, J. P. (2001). An evaluation of the Florida A-plus accountability and school choice program (Program on Education Policy and Governance Research Paper). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. Available at http:// www.ksg.harvard.edu/pepg/index.htm
29. Greene, J. P., Peterson, P. E., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. In P. E. Peterson & B. C. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 335–356). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. Learning from school choice, 335–356.
30. Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–1177.The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature 24:1141–1177.
31. Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141–164.Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19:141–164.
32. Henig, J., Moser, M., Holyoke, T., & Lacireno-Paquet, N. (1999). Making a choice, making a difference? An evaluation of charter schools in the District of Columbia. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Center for Washington Area Studies.Making a choice, making a difference? An evaluation of charter schools in the District of Columbia.
33. Hill, P., & Celio, M. B. (1999). Catholic schools. In D. Ravitch & J. Viteritt, (Eds.), City schools: lessons from New York (pp. 237–268). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Catholic schools. City schools: lessons from New York, 237–268.
34. Howell, W. G., & Peterson, P. E. (2001). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools.
35. Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Peterson, P. E., & Campbell, D. E. (2001). Vouchers in New York, Dayton, and DC. Education Matters, 1(2), 48–54.Vouchers in New York, Dayton, and DC. Education Matters 1:48–54.
36. Hoxby, C. M. (1994). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers? (National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper No. 4979). Available at http://papers.nber.org/papers/w4979
37. Hoxby, C. M. (1998). What do America's "traditional" forms of school choice teach us about school choice reforms? Economic Policy Review, 4(1), 47–60.What do America's "traditional" forms of school choice teach us about school choice reforms? Economic Policy Review 4:47–60.
38. Jud, G., & Watts, J. (1981). Schools and housing values. Land Economics, 57, 459–470.Schools and housing values. Land Economics 57:459–470.
39. Lee, V. E., Croninger, R. G., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 434–457.Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16:434–457.
40. Lines, P. M. (1999). Homeschooling: Estimating numbers and growth. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
41. Lines, P. M. (2000). Homeschooling comes of age. Public Interest, 140(20), 74–85.Homeschooling comes of age. Public Interest 140:74–85.
42. Muranto, R. (2001). Finishing touches. Education Next, 1(4), 20–25.Finishing touches. Education Next 1:20–25.
43. Neal, D. (1997). The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 15(1), 98–123.The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics 15:98–123.
44. Noell, J. (1983). Public and private schools: A reanalysis of "Public and private schools." Sociology of Education, 56, 123–132.Public and private schools: A reanalysis of "Public and private schools." Sociology of Education 56:123–132.
45. Patton, J. M. (1998). The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: Looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 25–31.The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: Looking behind the curtain for understanding and solutions. Journal of Special Education 32:25–31.
46. Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (1999). The 31st annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 41–56.The 31st annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan 81:41–56.
47. Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 553–602.Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:553–602.
48. Sander, W. (1999). Private schools and public school achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 34, 697–709.Private schools and public school achievement. Journal of Human Resources 34:697–709.
49. Schneider, M., Teske, P., Marschall, M., Mintrom, M., & Roch, C. (1997). Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 82–93.Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: The effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review 91:82–93.
50. Shokraii, N. (1996). Free at last: Black America signs up for school choice. Policy Review, 80, 20–26. Available at http://www.policyreview.org/nov96/backup/shokraii.html
51. Teske, P., Schneider, M., Roch, C., & Marschall, M. (1999). Public school choice: A status report. In D. Ravitch & J. Viteritt (Eds.), City schools: Lessons from New York (pp. 313–338). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Witte, J. F. (1997). Achievement effects of the Milwaukee voucher program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, Washington, DC.