The Educational Science and Scientifically Based Instruction We Need: Lessons from Reading Research and Policymaking

References

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Beginning to read.
2. Allington, R. L. (2003a). Accelerating in the wrong direction: Why thirty years of federal testing and accountability hasn't worked yet and what we might do instead. In R. L. Allington (Ed.), Big Brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidenceAccelerating in the wrong direction: Why thirty years of federal testing and accountability hasn't worked yet and what we might do instead. Big Brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence, 235–263.
3. Allington, R. L. (2003b). Big Brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Big Brother and the national reading curriculum: How ideology trumped evidence.
4. Anderson, E., & Guthrie, J. T. (1999, April). Motivating children to gain conceptual knowledge from text: The combination of science observation and interesting texts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
5. Barnett, W. S., Young, J., & Schweinhart, L. J. (1998). How preschool education contributes to cognitive development and school success: An empirical model. In W. S. Barnett & S. S. Boocock (Eds.), Early care and education for children in poverty: Promises, programs, and long-term outcomes (pp. 167–184). Albany: State University of New York Press.How preschool education contributes to cognitive development and school success: An empirical model. Early care and education for children in poverty: Promises, programs, and long-term outcomes, 167–184.
6. Bogatz, G. A., & Ball, S. (1971). The second year of Sesame Street: A continuing evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7. Brown, A. L., Smiley, S. S., Day, J. D., Townsend, M. A. R., & Lawton, S. C. (1977). Intrusion of a thematic idea in children's comprehension and retention of stories. Child Development, 48, 1454–1466.Intrusion of a thematic idea in children's comprehension and retention of stories. Child Development 48:1454–1466.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.
9. Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Development, 65, 684–698.Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Development 65:684–698.
10. Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.Learning to read: The great debate.
11. Cook, T. D. (2002). Randomized experiments in education: Why are they so rare? Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 175–199.Randomized experiments in education: Why are they so rare? Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24:175–199.
12. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Crain-Thoresen, C., & Dale, P. S. (1995, April). Parent vs. staff storybook reading as an intervention for language delay. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Indianapolis.
14. Cunningham, J. (2001). Essay book review: The National Reading Panel Report. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 326–335.
15. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18–37.A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology 88:18–37.
16. Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 91:403–414.
17. Bush, G. W. (2001, February 27). State of the union address. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress. Retrieved August 29, 2003, from http://www.nationalissues.com/candidates/bush_ speech_to_congress.html http://www.nationalissues.com/candidates/bush_ speech_to_congress.html
18. Byrnes, J. P. (2000). Using instructional time effectively. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 188–208). New York: Guilford.Using instructional time effectively. Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation, 188–208.
19. Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Yurecko, M. (2003). Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal education policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(15). Retrieved Sept. 6, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n15/ http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n15/
20. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. Handbook of reading research, 255–291.
21. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (2000). When less may be more: A two-year longitudinal evaluation of a volunteer tutoring program requiring minimal training. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 454–519.
22. Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1970). The first year of Sesame Street: An evaluation. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
23. Ball, S., & Bogatz, G. A. (1973). A summary of the major findings from "Reading with Television": An evaluation of The Electric Company. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.A summary of the major findings from "Reading with Television": An evaluation of.
24. Barnett, W. S. (2001). Preschool education for economically disadvantaged children: Effects on reading achievement and related outcomes. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 421–443). New York: Guilford.Preschool education for economically disadvantaged children: Effects on reading achievement and related outcomes. Handbook of early literacy research, 421–443.
25. Sanders, W. L., & Horn, S. P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee value-added assessment system (TVAAS) database: Implications for education evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247–256.
26. Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford.Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. Handbook of early literacy research, 97–110.
27. Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Memory development between two and twenty.
28. Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., Weikart, D. P., Barnett, W. S., & Epstein, E. S. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation No. 10). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
29. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958–996.
30. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
31. Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (Eds.). (2001). Success for all: Research and reform in elementary education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Smith, C. B. (1994). Whole language: The debate. Bloomington, IN: ERIC/REC.Whole language: The debate.
33. Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Understanding the styles of science in the study of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 105–126.Understanding the styles of science in the study of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 7:105–126.
34. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.
35. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., & Garvan, C. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 579–593.Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 91:579–593.
36. Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Whitehurst, G. J. (1992). Accelerating language development through picture book reading: A systematic extension to Mexican day care. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1106–1114.Accelerating language development through picture book reading: A systematic extension to Mexican day care. Developmental Psychology 28:1106–1114.
37. Wasik, B. A. (1998). Volunteer tutoring programs in reading: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 266–292.
38. Wasik, B. A., & Bond, M. A. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 243–250.Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 93:243–250.
39. Weikart, D. P., Bond, J. T., & McNeil, J. T. (1978). The Ypsilanti Perry Preschool Project: Preschool years and longitudinal results through fourth grade. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.The Ypsilanti Perry Preschool Project: Preschool years and longitudinal results through fourth grade.
40. Wharton-McDonald, R., Pressley, M., & Hampston, J. M. (1998). Outstanding literacy instruction in first grade: Teacher practices and student achievement. Elementary School Journal, 99, 101–128.Outstanding literacy instruction in first grade: Teacher practices and student achievement. Elementary School Journal 99:101–128.
41. Whitehurst, G. J., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Payne, A. C., Crone, D. A., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention in Head Start. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 542–555.Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention in Head Start. Journal of Educational Psychology 86:542–555.
42. Whitehurst, G. J., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., DeBaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C., & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology 24:552–559.
43. Whitehurst, G. J., Zevenbergen, A. A., Crone, D. A., Schultz, M. D., Velting, O. N. M., & Fischel, J. E. (1999). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 261–272.Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology 91:261–272.
44. Pressley, M., Allington, R. L., Wharton-McDonald, R., Morrow, L. M., & Block, C. C. (2001). Learning to read: Lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford.Learning to read: Lessons from exemplary first-grade classrooms.
45. Pressley, M., Dolezal, S. E., Raphael, L. M., Welsh, L. M., Bogner, K., & Roehrig, A. D. (2003). Motivating primary-grade students. New York: Guilford.Motivating primary-grade students.
46. Pressley, M., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1997). What we know about translating comprehension strategies instruction research into practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 486–488.
47. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., & Brown, R. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 511–554.Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal 92:511–554.
48. Pressley, M., Gaskins, I. W., Wile, D., Cunicelli, E. A., & Sheridan, J. (1991). Teaching literacy strategies across the curriculum: A case study at Benchmark School. In S. McCormick & J. Zutell (Eds.), 40th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 219–228). Chicago: National Reading Conference.Teaching literacy strategies across the curriculum: A case study at Benchmark School. 40th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 219–228.
49. Pressley, M., Raphael, L., Gallagher, D., & DiBella, J. (2003). Providence-St. Mel School: How a school that works for African-American students works. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Department of Teacher Education.Providence-St. Mel School: How a school that works for African-American students works.
50. Rice, M. L., Huston, A. C., Truglio, R., & Wright, J. C. (1990). Words from Sesame Street: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology, 26, 421–428.Words from Sesame Street: Learning vocabulary while viewing. Developmental Psychology 26:421–428.
51. Robbins, C., & Ehri, L. C. (1994). Reading storybooks to kindergartners helps them learn new vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 54–64.Reading storybooks to kindergartners helps them learn new vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology 86:54–64.
52. Rosenhouse, J., Feitelson, D., Kita, B., & Goldstein, Z. (1997). Interactive reading aloud to Israeli first graders: Its contribution to literacy development. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 168–183.
53. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of nineteen experimental studies. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.Reciprocal teaching: A review of nineteen experimental studies. Review of Educational Research 64:479–530.
54. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 66:181–221.
55. Samuels, S. J. (2002). Reading fluency: Its development and assessment. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 166–183). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
56. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., Baker, K., Brooks, G., Cronin, J., Nelson, E., & Woo, D. (2001). A study of effective grade-1 literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 35–58.A study of effective grade-1 literacy instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading 5:35–58.
57. Purcell-Gates, V. (2001). The role of qualitative and ethnographic research. Reading Online. Available online at: http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp? HREF=purcell-gates/index.html http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp? HREF=purcell-gates/index.html
58. Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2:31–74.
59. Reyna, V. (2002). U. S. Department of Education seminar on scientifically based research. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
60. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the core knowledge sequence. Elementary School Journal, 101, 167–191.School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the core knowledge sequence. Elementary School Journal 101:167–191.
61. Dickinson, D. K., & Smith, M. W. (1994). Long-term effects of preschool teachers' book readings on low-income children's vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 104–122.
62. Dolch, E. W. (1939). A manual for remedial reading. Champaign, IL: Garrard Press.A manual for remedial reading.
63. Dolch, E. W. (1941). Teaching primary reading. Champaign, IL: Garrard Press.Teaching primary reading.
64. Dolezal, S. E., Welsh, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. (2003). How do grade-3 teachers motivate their students? Elementary School Journal, 103, 239–267.How do grade-3 teachers motivate their students? Elementary School Journal 103:239–267.
65. Ehri, L. C. (2002). Response to Krashen. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 128–129.
66. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research 71:393–447.
67. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
68. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., & Moody, S. W. (2000). How effective are one-toone tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.How effective are one-toone tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology 92:605–619.
69. Finn, J. D. (2002). Class-size reduction in grades K–3. In A. Molnar (Ed.), School reform proposals: The research evidence (pp. 27–48). Greenwich CT: Information Age.
70. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557–577.
71. Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 97–109.Tennessee's class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21:97–109.
72. Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 109, 145–183.The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record 109:145–183.
73. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.
74. Fitzgerald, J. (2001). Can minimally trained college student volunteers help young at-risk children to read better? Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 28–47.
75. Fletcher, J. M., & Lyon, G. R. (1998). Reading: A research-based approach. In W. M. Evers (Ed.), What's gone wrong in America's classrooms (pp. 49–90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Reading: A research-based approach. What's gone wrong in America's classrooms, 49–90.
76. Frijters, J. C., Barron, R. W., & Brunello, M. (2000). Direct and mediated influences on home literacy and literacy interest on preschoolers' oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 466–477.Direct and mediated influences on home literacy and literacy interest on preschoolers' oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 92:466–477.
77. Garan, E. M. (2003). Beyond smoke and mirrors: A critique of the National Reading Panel report on phonics. In R. L. Allington (Ed.), Big Brother and the national reading curriculum (pp. 90–111). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
78. Gaskins, I. W., Anderson, R. C., Pressley, M., Cunicelli, E. A., & Satlow, E. (1993). Six teachers' dialogue during cognitive process instruction. Elementary School Journal, 93, 277–304.Six teachers' dialogue during cognitive process instruction. Elementary School Journal 93:277–304.
79. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5:3–8.
80. Glass, G. V. (1978). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
81. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Looking in classrooms.
82. Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children.
83. Invernizzi, M., Juel, C., & Rosemary, C. A. (1997). A community tutorial that works. Reading Teacher, 50, 304–311.A community tutorial that works. Reading Teacher 50:304–311.
84. Jones, E. M., Gottfredson, G. D., & Gottfredson, D. C. (1997). Success for some: An evaluation of a Success for All program. Evaluation Review, 21, 643–670.Success for some: An evaluation of a Success for All program. Evaluation Review 21:643–670.
85. Keene, E. O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop.
86. Knapp, M. S., & Associates. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
87. Koskinen, P. S., Blum, I. H., Bisson, S. A., Phillips, S. M., Creamer, T. S., & Baker, T. K. (2000). Book access, shared reading, and audio models: The effects of supporting the literacy learning of linguistically diverse students in school and at home. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 23–36.Book access, shared reading, and audio models: The effects of supporting the literacy learning of linguistically diverse students in school and at home. Journal of Educational Psychology 92:23–36.
88. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6:293–323.
89. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.The art and science of portraiture.
90. Leslie, L., & Allen, L. (1999). Factors that predict success in an early literacy intervention project. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 404–424.
91. Liberman, A. M. (1992). The relation of speech to reading and writing. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 193–210). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.The relation of speech to reading and writing. Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 193–210.
92. Linebarger, D. L. (2001). Learning to read from television: The effects of using captions and narration. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 288–298.Learning to read from television: The effects of using captions and narration. Journal of Educational Psychology 93:288–298.
93. Linebarger, D. L., Kosanic, A., Greenwood, C. R., & Doku, N. S. (in press). Effects of viewing the television program Between the Lions on the emergent literacy skills of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology.
94. Lipson, M. Y. (1983). The influence of religious affiliation on children's memory for text information. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 448–457.
95. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 70:151–159.
96. Lyon, R. (July 10, 1997). Report on learning disabilities research (Testimony before the Committee on Education and the Workforce). Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives.
97. Lysynchuk, L. M., Pressley, M., D'Ailly, H., Smith, M., & Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental evaluations of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458–470.
98. Official Core Knowledge Schools. (2003, July 1). Retrieved September 6, 2003, from http://www.coreknowledge.org/CKproto2/schools/schllst_O.htm#Intr http://www.coreknowledge.org/CKproto2/schools/schllst_O.htm#Intr
99. 107th Congress. (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: United States Congress.
100. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1:117–175.
101. Paterson, F. R. A. (2003). The politics of phonics. In R. L. Allington (Ed.), Big Brother and the national reading curriculum (pp. 157–194). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.The politics of phonics. Big Brother and the national reading curriculum, 157–194.
102. Pearson, P. D. (2002, May). Up the down staircase: The role of research in policy and practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, San Francisco.
103. Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 715–729.Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Educational Psychology 90:715–729.
104. Perry, N. E., & VandeKamp, K. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children's development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 821–843.Creating classroom contexts that support young children's development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research 33:821–843.
105. Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37, 5–15.Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 37:5–15.
106. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 3, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? Handbook of reading research.
107. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading.
108. McGill-Franzen, A., Allington, R., Yokoi, L., & Brooks, G. (1999). Putting books in the room seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 67–74.Putting books in the room seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research 93:67–74.
109. Mehan, H. (1979). Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Social organization in the classroom.
110. Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 165–177.Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21:165–177.
111. Morrow, L. M. (1990). Preparing the classroom environment to promote literacy during play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 537–554.
112. Morrow, L. M. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature, and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 251–275.
113. Morrow, L. M., Pressley, M., Smith, J. K., & Smith, M. (1997). The effect of a literaturebased program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 54–76.
114. Morrow, L. M., & Woo, D. G. (2000). Tutoring programs for struggling readers: The America Reads challenge. New York: Guilford.Tutoring programs for struggling readers: The America Reads challenge.
115. Myers, W. D. (1996). The glory field. New York: Scholastic.The glory field.
116. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
117. Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1990). The influence of literacy-enriched play settings on preschoolers' engagement with written language. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms (pp. 179–188). Chicago: National Reading Conference.The influence of literacy-enriched play settings on preschoolers' engagement with written language. Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms, 179–188.
118. Neuman, S. B., & Roskos, K. (1992). Literacy objects as cultural tools: Effects on children's literacy behaviors in play. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 203–225.
119. Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127–142.The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21:127–142.