Further Comment: Freedle's Table 2: Fact or Fiction?

References

1. Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. Differential item functioning, 35–66.
2. Dorans, N. J., & Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355–368.Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Journal of Educational Measurement 23:355–368.
3. Dorans, N. J., & Zeller, K. (2003). Examining Freedle's claims about bias and his proposed solution: Dated data, inappropriate measurement and incorrect and unfair scoring. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.Test equating: Methods and practices.
5. Lawrence, I. M., Rigol, G. W., Van Essen, T., & Jackson, C. A. (2003). An historical perspective on the SAT 1926–2001 (College Board Research Report No. 03-03, ETS RR-03-10). New York: College Board.
6. Mathews, J. (2003, November). The bias question. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 130–140.The bias question. Atlantic Monthly, 130–140.
7. Schmitt, A. P., Holland, P. W., & Dorans, N. J. (1993). Evaluating of hypotheses about differential item functioning. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 281–315). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Evaluating of hypotheses about differential item functioning. Differential item functioning, 281–315.
8. Zieky, M. (1993). Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 337–347). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Practical questions in the use of DIF statistics in test development. Differential item functioning, 337–347.