Troubling Images of Teaching in No Child Left Behind

References

1. Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 30–63.(In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review 76:30–63.
2. Acker, S. (1996). Gender and teachers work. In M. Apple (Ed.), Review of research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–162). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Allington, R., & Johnston, P. (2002). Reading to learn: lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford Press.Reading to learn: lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms.
4. American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence. (2006). American board for certification of teacher excellence website. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http:// www.abcte.org/ http:// www.abcte.org/
5. Anderson, G., & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–21.The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities? Educational Researcher 28:12–21.
6. Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York: Routledge.Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement.
7. Apple, M. (1987). The de-skilling of teachers. In F. Bolin & J. M. Falk (Eds.), Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices (pp. 59–75). New York: Teachers College Press.The de-skilling of teachers. Teacher renewal: Professional issues, personal choices, 59–75.
8. Apple, M. (2006). Educating the "right" way: Market, standards, God, and inequality. New York: Routledge.Educating the "right" way: Market, standards, God, and inequality.
9. Ballenger, C. (1998). Teaching other people's children: Literacy and learning in a bilingual classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Teaching other people's children: Literacy and learning in a bilingual classroom.
10. Berliner, D. C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational research. Teachers College Record, 108, 949–995.Our impoverished view of educational research. Teachers College Record 108:949–995.
11. Bracey, G. (2003). April foolishness: The 20th anniversary of A Nation at Risk. Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://www.pekintl.org/kappan/k0304bra.htm http://www.pekintl.org/kappan/k0304bra.htm
12. Bracey, G. (2004). Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the U.S. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Setting the record straight: Responses to misconceptions about public education in the U.S.
13. Bush, G. (2002, September 4). Remarks by the president on educational implementation. Press Release: President Highlights Progress Made in Education Reform (The East Room, the White House, Office of the Press Secretary). Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http// www.whitehouse.gov.news/releases/2002/09/20020904_6.html http// www.whitehouse.gov.news/releases/2002/09/20020904_6.html
14. Campano, G. (in press). Immigrant children and literacy: Reading, writing and remembering. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Center on Education Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The new teacher education: For better or for worse? Educational Researcher, 34(6), pp. 181–206.
17. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Paradigms and politics. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999a). Relationship of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249–306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
20. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999b). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
21. Cohen, D. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11–17, 31.What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24 (9), 11–17:31.
22. Crowe, K. J. (1993). Redefining the profession: The approach of a government policy document to teachers in Australia. Teaching and Teachers' Work, 1(2), 1–7.Redefining the profession: The approach of a government policy document to teachers in Australia. Teaching and Teachers' Work 1:1–7.
23. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Professional development schools: Schools for a developing profession. New York: Teachers College Press.Professional development schools: Schools for a developing profession.
24. Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). From "separate but equal" to "No Child Left Behind": The collision of new standards and old inequalities. In D. Meier & G. Wood (Eds.), Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools (pp. 3–32). Boston: Beacon Press.From "separate but equal" to "No Child Left Behind": The collision of new standards and old inequalities. Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools, 3–32.
25. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. (1996). Who teaches and why. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 67–101). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
26. Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (Eds.). (1999). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice.
27. Decker, P., Mayer, D., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of Teach For America on students: Findings from a national evaluation (MPR reference No: m 8792-750). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.The effects of Teach For America on students: Findings from a national evaluation.
28. Dudley-Marling, C. (1997). Living with uncertainty: The messy reality of classroom practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Living with uncertainty: The messy reality of classroom practice.
29. Edelsky, C. (2005). What's resisted, who's resisting, and other questions. Practitioner Inquiry Day at the Ethnography in Education Forum. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. February 26, 2005.What's resisted, who's resisting, and other questions.
30. Erickson, F. (2005). Arts, humanities and sciences in educational research and social engineering in federal education policy. Teachers College Record, 107, 4–9.
31. Evans, R. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York: Teachers College Press.The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?.
32. Fuhrman, S., & Lazerson, M. (Eds.). (2005). The public schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.The public schools.
33. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform.
34. Gee, J. (1999). Reading and the new literacy studies: Reframing the national academy of sciences report on reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 355–374.
35. Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning.
36. Hammersley, M. (2000). Evidence-based practice and the contribution of educational research. In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 163–183). London: Blackwell Science.Evidence-based practice and the contribution of educational research. Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal, 163–183.
37. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity.
38. Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, 127–150.
39. Hursh, D. (2006). The crisis in urban education: Resisting neoliberal policies and forging democratic possibilities. Educational Researcher, 35(4), 19–25.The crisis in urban education: Resisting neoliberal policies and forging democratic possibilities. Educational Researcher 35:19–25.
40. Ingersoll, R. (2003). Who controls teachers' work? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Who controls teachers' work?.
41. Interview: U.S. secretary of education Margaret Spellings. (2005) Harvard Educational Review, 75, 364–382.
42. Johnson, S. M., & Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools.
43. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.An elusive science: The troubling history of education research.
44. Lather, P. (2004). This is your father's paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34.
45. Lieberman, A., & Miller, J. (1991). Staff development for education in the '90s. New York: Teachers College Press.Staff development for education in the '90s.
46. Linn, R. (2003). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32, 3–13.Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher 32:3–13.
47. Lipman, P. (2003). High-stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform. New York: Falmer Press.High-stakes education: Inequality, globalization and urban school reform.
48. Little, J., & McLaughlin, M. (1993). Teacher's work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts. New York: Teachers College Press.Teacher's work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts.
49. Luke, A. (2004). Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record, 106, 1422–1443.Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record 106:1422–1443.
50. Lytle, S. (2006). The literacies of teaching urban adolescents in these times. In D. Alvermann, K. Hinchman, D. Moore, S. Phelps, & D. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 257–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.The literacies of teaching urban adolescents in these times. Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives, 257–277.
51. Meier, M., & Wood, G. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston: Beacon Press.Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools.
52. National Board for Professional Teacher Standards. (n.d.). What teachers should know and be able to do. Detroit, MI: National Board for Professional Teaching Standards.
53. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
54. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
55. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities.
56. Noffke, S. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22, 305–343.
57. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Keeping track.
58. Olson, L. (2004, December 8). Taking root. Education Week, pp. S1, S3, S7.Taking root. Education Week, S1, S3, S7.
59. Online News Hour with Ray Suarez. (2005, April 7). Newsmaker, Margaret Spellings. Online News Hour. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/ education/janjune05/spellings http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/ education/janjune05/spellings
60. Orfield, G., Losen, D., & Wald, J. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis.
61. Paige, R. (2001, June 20). Remarks by the U.S. Secretary of Education at the Summit on the 21st Century Workforce. MCI Center. White House Press Release. Retrieved January 7, 2006, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010620-1.html http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/06/20010620-1.html
62. Paige, R. (2003). Annual back to school address. National Press Club. September 24, 2003, Washington, DC. Retrieved January 7, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/news/ speeches/2003/09/09242003.html http://www.ed.gov/news/ speeches/2003/09/09242003.html
63. Paige, R. (2004, September 24). Annual back to school address. National Press Club. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved January 7, 2006, from http:// www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2004/09/09182004.html http:// www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2004/09/09182004.html
64. Pear, R. (2004, February 24). Education chief calls union "terrorist," then recants. The New York Times, p. A20.Education chief calls union "terrorist," then recants. The New York Times, A20.
65. Poetter, T., Wegwert, J., & Haerr, C. (Eds.). (2006). No Child Left Behind and the illusion of reform: Critical essays by educators. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.No Child Left Behind and the illusion of reform: Critical essays by educators.
66. Popkewitz, T. (1991). A political sociology of educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.A political sociology of educational reform.
67. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Allington, R. L., Block, C. C., Morrow, L., Tracey, D., et al. (2001). The nature of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies in Reading, 5, 35–58.The nature of effective first-grade literacy instruction. Scientific Studies in Reading 5:35–58.
68. Sanders, W. (1998). Value-added assessment. The School Administrator, 11(55), 24–27.Value-added assessment. The School Administrator 11:24–27.
69. Sanders, W., & Horn, S. (1994). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 299–311.The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-model methodology in educational assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 8:299–311.
70. Schemo, D. (2002, October 24). States get federal warning on school standards. The New York Times, p. 25.States get federal warning on school standards. The New York Times, 25.
71. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 1–22.Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 51:1–22.
72. Simon, K. (2005). Classroom deliberations. In S. Fuhrman & M. Lazerson (Eds.), The public schools (pp. 107–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Classroom deliberations. The public schools, 107–129.
73. Smyth, J. (2001). Critical politics of teachers' work: An Australian perspective. New York: Peter Lang.Critical politics of teachers' work: An Australian perspective.
74. Spellings, M. (2006, April 27). Remarks at the No Child Left Behind summit: The path to 2014. Philadelphia School District Education Center. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/04/04272006.html http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/04/04272006.html
75. State group: ESEA bills "seriously flawed." (2001, October 10). Education Week, p. 31.Education Week.
76. Stenhouse, L. (1985). Research as a basis for teaching. London: Heinemann.
77. Stevens, L. P. (2003). Reading First: A critical policy analysis [Electronic version]. The Reading Teacher, 56, 662–669.
78. Sykes, G. (1999). Teacher and student learning: Strengthening their connection. In L. Darling Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 151–179). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Teacher and student learning: Strengthening their connection. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, 151–179.
79. Symcox, L. (2002). Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms.
80. Trinder, L., & Reynolds, S. (Eds.). (2000). Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal. London: Blackwell Science.Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal.
81. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
82. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
83. U.S. Department of Education. (2004a). No Child Left Behind: A toolkit for teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Deputy Secretary. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/04/04272006.html http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2006/04/04272006.html
84. U.S. Department of Education. (2004b). The secretary's third annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
85. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). The secretary's fourth annual report on teacher quality: A highly qualified teacher in every classroom. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education.
86. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). Educating the "good citizen": Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science and Politics, 37, 241–247.Educating the "good citizen": Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science and Politics 37:241–247.
87. What Works Clearinghouse. (2003) What works clearinghouse. Retrieved May 6, 2006, from www.w-w-c.org www.w-w-c.org
88. Whitehurst, G. (2001). Evidence-based education. Retrieved September 12, 2003, from www.ed.gov www.ed.gov
89. Whitehurst, G. (2002). Scientifically based research on teacher quality: Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Paper presented at the White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers, Washington, DC. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/tchrqual/learn/preparingteachersconference/ whitehurst.html http://www.ed.gov/admins/tchrqual/learn/preparingteachersconference/ whitehurst.html
90. Wright, S., Horn, S., & Sanders, W. (1997). Teachers and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57–67.Teachers and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 11:57–67.
91. Zeichner, K., & Conklin, H. (2005). Research on teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 645–736). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.