Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy

References

1. Alvermann, D. E., O'Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R. (1990). What teachers do when they say they're having discussions of content area reading assignments: A qualitative analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 296–322.
2. American College Testing. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
3. Arc, G., Phillips, K. R., & McKenzie, D. (2000). On the bottom rung: A profile of Americans in low-income working families. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.On the bottom rung: A profile of Americans in low-income working families.
4. Barry, A. L. (1994). The staffing of high school remedial reading programs in the United States since 1920. Journal of Reading, 38, 14–22.The staffing of high school remedial reading programs in the United States since 1920. Journal of Reading 38:14–22.
5. Barton, P. E., & Jenkins, L. (1995). Literacy and dependency: The literacy skills of welfare recipients in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Literacy and dependency: The literacy skills of welfare recipients in the United States.
6. Bazerman, C. (1998). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Beck, A. J., & Harrison, P. M. (2001). Prisoners in 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Prisoners in 2000.
8. Bereiter, C., & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131–156.Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction 2:131–156.
9. Berkman, N. D., DeWalt, D. A., Pignone, M. P., Sheridan, S. L., Lohr, K. N., Lux, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., & Bonito, A. J. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
10. Blair, L. (1999). Reading across the region. SEDLetter, 11(1). Retrieved October 31, 2007, from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v11n01/ http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedletter/v11n01/
11. Carnevale, A. P. (1991). America and the new economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.America and the new economy.
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Tacoma, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence.
13. De La Paz, S. (2005). Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 139–156.Effects of historical reasoning instruction and writing strategy mastery in culturally and academically diverse middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 97:139–156.
14. Deshler, D. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Nair, M. (2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers.
15. Fang, Z. (2004). Scientific literacy: A functional linguistic perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347.Scientific literacy: A functional linguistic perspective. Science Education 89:335–347.
16. Frost, S. (2003). Foreword. In M. L. Kamil, Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
17. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Academic literacy and the nature of expertise: Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy.
18. Grigg, W., Donahue, P., & Dion, G. (2007). The nation's report card: 12th-grade reading and mathematics 2005 (NCES 2007-468). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185–235). London: Routledge.Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235.
20. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Writing science: Literacy and discursive power.
21. Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2002). Influences of writing tasks on students' answers to recall and higher-level test questions. Research in Science Education, 32, 19–34.
22. Hynd-Shanahan, C., Holschuh, J., & Hubbard, B. (2005). Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 141–176.Thinking like a historian: College students' reading of multiple historical documents. Journal of Literacy Research 36:141–176.
23. Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
24. Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., & Jenkins, L. (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
25. Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Dunleavy, E. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007-480). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy.
26. Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market.
27. Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221–267). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 221–267.
28. Mitchell, G. R., Carnes, K. H., & Mendosa, C. (2006). America's new deficit: The shortage of information technology workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Technology Policy.America's new deficit: The shortage of information technology workers.
29. Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 492–504.Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology 99:492–504.
30. O'Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 442–463.
31. Perle, M., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES-2006-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
32. Perle, M., & Moran, R. (2005). NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performances (NCES 2005-464). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.NAEP 2004 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performances.
33. Pickett, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language.
34. Pressley, M. (2004). The need for research on secondary literacy education. In T. L. Jetton, & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 415–432). New York: Guilford Press.
35. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1994). The psychology of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.The psychology of reading.
36. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective.
37. Shanahan, T. (1992). Reading comprehension as a conversation with an author. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 129–148). San Diego: Academic Press.Reading comprehension as a conversation with an author. Promoting academic competence and literacy in school, 129–148.
38. Shanahan, T. (1998). Readers' awareness of author. In N. Nelson & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), The reading-writing connection [Ninety-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education] (pp. 88–111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958–996.
40. Snow, C. E. (1987). The development of definitional skill. Journal of Child Language, 17, 697–710.The development of definitional skill. Journal of Child Language 17:697–710.
41. Solomon, Y., & O'Neill, J. (1998). Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education, 12(3), 210–221.Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education 12:210–221.
42. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Analysis of state K–3 reading standards and assessments: Final report. Washington, DC: Education Publications Center.
43. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Guide to U.S. Department of Education programs. Washington, DC: Office of Communications and Outreach.
44. VanSledright, B., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. Elementary School Journal, 98, 239–265.Reading American history: The influence of multiple sources on six fifth graders. Elementary School Journal 98:239–265.
45. Venezky, R. L., Kaestle, C. F., & Sum, A. (1987). The subtle danger: Reflections on the literacy abilities of young adults. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.The subtle danger: Reflections on the literacy abilities of young adults.