Redefining Content-Area Literacy Teacher Education: Finding My Voice through Collaboration

References

1. Bernstein, R. J. (1998). Community in the pragmatic tradition. In M. Dickstein (Ed.), The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture (pp. 141–156). London: Duke.Community in the pragmatic tradition. The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture, 141–156.
2. Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher 30:13–21.
3. Conley, M. (2008). Content area literacy: Learners in context. Boston: Pearson.Content area literacy: Learners in context.
4. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.
5. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.The public and its problems.
6. Draper, R. J. (2000). How secondary preservice mathematics, science, and social studies methods textbooks support content-area literacy instruction: A qualitative content analysis. Unpublished dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.
7. Draper, R. J. (2002a). Every teacher a literacy teacher? An examination of the literacy-related messages in secondary methods textbooks. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 357–384.Every teacher a literacy teacher? An examination of the literacy-related messages in secondary methods textbooks. Journal of Literacy Research 34:357–384.
8. Draper, R. J. (2002b). School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 520–529.School mathematics reform, constructivism, and literacy: A case for literacy instruction in the reform-oriented math classroom. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 45:520–529.
9. Draper, R. J., Hall, K. M., & Smith, L. K. (2006). The possibility of democratic educational research to nurture democratic educators. Action in Teacher Education, 28(2), 66–72.
10. Draper, R. J., & Siebert, D. (2004). Different goals, similar practices: Making sense of the mathematics and literacy instruction in a standards-based mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 927–962.
11. Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan.The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs.
12. Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 26–28.Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher 32:26–28.
13. Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2005). Literacy and language as learning in content-area classes: A departure from "every teacher a teacher of reading." Action in Teacher Education, 277(2), 3–11.Literacy and language as learning in content-area classes: A departure from "every teacher a teacher of reading." Action in Teacher Education 277:3–11.
14. Gee, J. P. (1989). What is literacy? Journal of Education, 171(1), 18–25.What is literacy? Journal of Education 171:18–25.
15. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses.
16. Gray, W. S. (1925). A modern program of reading instruction for the grades and high school. In G. M. Whipple (Ed.), Report of the National Committee on Reading: 24th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, part 1 (pp. 21–73). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
17. Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (Eds.). (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing.
18. Kist, W. (2001). Beginning to create the new literacy classroom: What does the new literacy look like? In J. A. Rycik & J. L. Irvin (Eds.), What adolescents deserve: A commitment to students' literacy learning (pp. 226–240). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Beginning to create the new literacy classroom: What does the new literacy look like? What adolescents deserve: A commitment to students' literacy learning, 226–240.
19. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.
20. Kremmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–606). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20.Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education 58:12–20.
22. Manzo, A. V., Manzo, U. C., & Estes, T. H. (2001). Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Content area literacy: Interactive teaching for active learning.
23. McIntosh, M. E., & Draper, R. J. (1997a). Logging on daily. Writing Teacher, 10(2), 26–29.Logging on daily. Writing Teacher 10:26–29.
24. McIntosh, M. E., & Draper, R. J. (1997b). Write starts: 101 learning logs for the mathematics classroom. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.Write starts: 101 learning logs for the mathematics classroom.
25. McIntosh, M. E., & Draper, R. J. (2001). Using learning logs in mathematics: Writing to learn. Mathematics Teacher, 94, 554–559.Using learning logs in mathematics: Writing to learn. Mathematics Teacher 94:554–559.
26. McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (1990). Content literacy: A definition and implications. Journal of Reading, 34, 184–186.Content literacy: A definition and implications. Journal of Reading 34:184–186.
27. Moje, E. B., Young, J. P., Readence, J. E., & Moore, D. W. (2000). Reinventing adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 400–410.Reinventing adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 43:400–410.
28. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
30. Neilsen, L. (1998). Playing for real: Performative texts and adolescent identities. In D. E. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, D. W. Moore, S. F. Phelps, & D. R. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (pp. 3–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Playing for real: Performative texts and adolescent identities. Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives, 3–26.
31. New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantizis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3–37). London: Routledge.
32. O'Brien, D. G., Stewart, R. A., & Moje, E. B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 442–463.
33. Peirce, C. S. (1955). The scientific attitude and fallibilism. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 42–59). New York: Dover.The scientific attitude and fallibilism. Philosophical writings of Peirce, 42–59.
34. Ratekin, N., Simpson, M. L., Alvermann, D. E., & Dishner, E. K. (1985). Why teachers resist content reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 28, 432–437.Why teachers resist content reading instruction. Journal of Reading 28:432–437.
35. Readence, J. E., Bean, T. W., & Baldwin, R. S. (2004). Content area literacy: An integrated approach (8th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Content area literacy: An integrated approach.
36. Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Three approaches to participative inquiry. Handbook of qualitative research, 324–339.
37. Reason, P. (1999). Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning, 30, 207–226.Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning 30:207–226.
38. Romine, B. G. C., McKenna, M. C., & Robinson, R. D. (1996). Reading coursework requirements for middle and high school content area teachers: A U.S. survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40, 194–198.Reading coursework requirements for middle and high school content area teachers: A U.S. survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 40:194–198.
39. Siebert, D., & Draper, R. J. (in press). Why content-area literacy messages do not speak to mathematics teachers: A critical content analysis. Literacy Research and Instruction.
40. Simpson, E. A. (1954). Helping high-school students read better. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
41. Stewart, R. A., & O'Brien, D. G. (1989). Resistance to content area reading: A focus on preservice teachers. Journal of Reading, 32, 396–401.Resistance to content area reading: A focus on preservice teachers. Journal of Reading 32:396–401.
42. Vacca, R. T. (2002). Making a difference in adolescents' school lives: Visible and invisible aspects of content area reading. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 184–204). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
43. Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. (2005). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.
44. Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. (2008). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.
45. Wade, S. E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 609–628). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.The role of text in classroom learning. Handbook of reading research: Volume III, 609–628.
46. Wenger, I. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.