Why the Arts Don't Do Anything: Toward a New Vision for Cultural Production in Education

References

1. Abreu, J. A. (2009, February). On kids transformed by music. Paper presented at the 2009 TED Prize Lecture. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/jose_abreu_on_kids_transformed_by_music.html http://www.ted.com/talks/jose_abreu_on_kids_transformed_by_music.html
2. Banaji, S., & Burn, A. (2007). Creativity through a rhetorical lens: Implications for schooling, literacy and media education. Literacy, 41(2), 62-70.Creativity through a rhetorical lens: Implications for schooling, literacy and media education. Literacy 41:62–70.
3. Banaji, S., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2010). The rhetorics of creativity: A literature review [2nd ed.]. Retrieved from http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/the-rhetorics-of-creativity-a-literature-review http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/the-rhetorics-of-creativity-a-literature-review
4. Bartel, L. R. (Ed.). (2004). Questioning the music education paradigm. Toronto: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.Questioning the music education paradigm.
5. Bartel, L., & Cameron, L. (2002, April). Pedagogical dilemmas in dance and music: Balancing the demands of the art with the needs of the person. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25693 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/25693
6. Bartel, L., & Cameron, L. (2004). From dilemmas to experience: Shaping the conditions of learning. In L. Bartel (Ed.), Questioning the music education paradigm. Toronto: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.Questioning the music education paradigm.
7. Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Art worlds.
8. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Determinants of impact: Towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends, 16(3), 225-275.Determinants of impact: Towards a better understanding of encounters with the arts. Cultural Trends 16:225–275.
9. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.The social impact of the arts: An intellectual history.
10. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2009). Researching the social impact of the arts: Literature, fiction, and the novel. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(1), 17-33.Researching the social impact of the arts: Literature, fiction, and the novel. International Journal of Cultural Policy 15:17–33.
11. Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations: Walter Benjamin essays and reflections (pp. 217-253). New York: Schocken Books.Illuminations: Walter Benjamin essays and reflections, pp 217–253.
12. Beyer, L. (2000). The arts, popular culture, and social change. New York: Peter Lang.The arts, popular culture, and social change.
13. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste.
14. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.The field of cultural production.
15. Bowman, W. (2005). More inquiring minds, more cogent questions, more provisional answers: The need to theorize music education—and its research. Music Education Research, 7(2), 153-168.More inquiring minds, more cogent questions, more provisional answers: The need to theorize music education—and its research. Music Education Research 7:153–168.
16. Burton, J., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 228-257.Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education 41:228–257.
17. Carpenter, B. S., & Tavin, K. M. (2010). Art education beyond reconceptualization: Enacting curriculum through/with/by/for/of/in/beyond/as visual culture, community, and public pedagogy. In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The ‘next’ moment (pp. 244-258). New York: Routledge.Curriculum studies handbook: The ‘next’ moment, pp 244–258.
18. Catterall, J. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? A response to Eisner. Art Education, 51(1), 6-11.Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? A response to Eisner. Art Education 51:6–11.
19. Catterall, J. (2001). Main points in response to “Mute those claims: No evidence (yet) for a causal link between the arts and academic achievement.” In E. Winner & L. Hetland (Eds.), Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes (pp. 32-37). Los Angeles: The Getty Center.Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes, pp 32–37.
20. Catterall, J. (2002). Overview. The arts and the transfer of learning. In R. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 151-157). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development, pp 151–157.
21. Chalmers, F. G. (1993). “Doing” histories of art education. Studies in Art Education, 34(4), 254-256.“Doing” histories of art education. Studies in Art Education 34:254–256.
22. Clark, A., & Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2004). Educating the artist of the future: Facing the challenge of public arts high schools. In R. Gaztambide-Fernández & J. Sears (Eds.), Curriculum work as a public moral enterprise (pp. 49-58). Denver: Rowman & Littlefield.Curriculum work as a public moral enterprise, pp 49–58.
23. Deasy, R. (Ed.). (2002) Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development.
24. DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Music in everyday life.
25. DeNora, T. (2003). After Adorno: Rethinking music sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.After Adorno: Rethinking music sociology.
26. Diederichsen, D. (2011, May). Radicalism as ego ideal: Oedipus and Narcissus. E-Flux, 25. Retrieved from http://www.e-flux.com/journal/radicalism-as-egoideal-oedipus-and-narcissus/ http://www.e-flux.com/journal/radicalism-as-egoideal-oedipus-and-narcissus/
27. Dorn, C. (2003). Sociology and the ends of arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(5), 3-13.Sociology and the ends of arts education. Arts Education Policy Review 104:3–13.
28. Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 101-112.Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education 42:101–112.
29. Efland, A. (1990). A history of art education. New York: Teachers College Press.A history of art education.
30. Eisner, E. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.Educating artistic vision.
31. Eisner, E. (1998). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education, 51(1), 7-15.Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Art Education 51:7–15.
32. Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education 54:6–10.
33. Eisner, E. (2002). Arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Arts and the creation of mind.
34. Evrard, Y. (1997). Democratizing culture or cultural democracy? Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 27(3), 167-175.Democratizing culture or cultural democracy? Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society 27:167–175.
35. Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white masks (C. L. Markman, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.Black skin, white masks.
36. Fish, S. (2008, January 6). Will the humanities save us? New York Times. Retrieved from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/will-the-humanities-save-us/?smid=pl-share http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/will-the-humanities-save-us/?smid=pl-share
37. Florida, R. L. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life.
38. Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics, and the social life of art.
39. Gabbard, D. (Ed.). (2008). Knowledge and power in the global economy: The effects of school reform in a neoliberal age. New York: Routledge.Knowledge and power in the global economy: The effects of school reform in a neoliberal age.
40. Gablick, S. (1991). The reenchantment of art. New York: Thames & Hudson.The reenchantment of art.
41. Gallagher, K. (2007). The theatre of urban: Youth and schooling in dangerous times. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.The theatre of urban: Youth and schooling in dangerous times.
42. Gallagher, K., & Neelands, J. (2011). Drama and theater in urban contexts [Special Issue Editorial]. Research in Drama Education, 16(2), 151-156.Drama and theater in urban contexts [Special Issue Editorial]. Research in Drama Education 16:151–156.
43. Galloway, S. (2009). Theory-based evaluation and the social impact of the arts. Cultural Trends, 18(2), 125-148.Theory-based evaluation and the social impact of the arts. Cultural Trends 18:125–148.
44. Gattinger, M. (2011). Democratization of culture, cultural democracy and governance. Ottawa: Canadian Public Affairs Funders. Retrieved from http://www.cpaf-opsac.org/en/themes/documents/CPAF_2011_AGM_Democratization_of_Culture_Cultural_Democracy_Governance_Mar082012_000.pdf http://www.cpaf-opsac.org/en/themes/documents/CPAF_2011_AGM_Democratization_of_Culture_Cultural_Democracy_Governance_Mar082012_000.pdf
45. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2002). (De)Constructing art as a model/(Re)Constructing art as a possibility: An interactive essay exploring the possibilities of the arts in relationship to education. In T. Poetter, K. Wilson Baptist, C. Higgins, C. Haerr, & M. Hayes (Eds.), In(Ex)clusion: (Re)Visioning the democratic ideal—Selected papers from the 2001 curriculum and pedagogy annual conference (pp. 83-107). Troy, NY: Educator's International Press.In(Ex)clusion: (Re)Visioning the democratic ideal—Selected papers from the 2001 curriculum and pedagogy annual conference, pp 83–107.
46. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2007). Inner, outer, and in-between: Why popular culture and the arts matter for urban youth. Orbit, 36(3), 35-37.Inner, outer, and in-between: Why popular culture and the arts matter for urban youth. Orbit 36:35–37.
47. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2008). The artist in society: Understandings, expectations, and curriculum implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(3), 233-265.The artist in society: Understandings, expectations, and curriculum implications. Curriculum Inquiry 38:233–265.
48. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2010a). Wherefore the musicians? Philosophy of Music Education Review, 18(1), 65-84.Wherefore the musicians? Philosophy of Music Education Review 18:65–84.
49. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (Ed.). (2010b). Specialized arts programs in the Toronto District School Board: Exploratory case studies; Report of the Urban Arts High Schools Project, Phase 1: Exploratory Research 2007-2009 [Technical research report]. Toronto: Centre for Urban Schooling, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1807/30018 http://hdl.handle.net/1807/30018
50. Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2011). Musicking in the city: Reconceptualizing urban music education as cultural practice. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education, 10(1), 14-45.Musicking in the city: Reconceptualizing urban music education as cultural practice. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education 10:14–45.
51. Gaztambide-Fernández, R., & Nicholls, R. (2012, May). For what purpose the arts: An analysis of the mission statements of urban arts high schools in Canada and the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. Waterloo, ON.For what purpose the arts: An analysis of the mission statements of urban arts high schools in Canada and the United States.
52. Gaztambide-Fernández, R., Saifer, A., & Desai, C. (in press). “Talent” and the misrecognition of social advantage in specialized arts education. The Roeper Review—A Journal on Gifted Education.
53. Gaztambide-Fernández, R., VanderDussen, E., & Cairns, K. (2012, March 2). “The mall” and “the plant”: Choice and the classed construction of possible futures in two specialized arts programs. Education and Urban Society. doi: 10.1177/0013124512438226“The mall” and “the plant”: Choice and the classed construction of possible futures in two specialized arts programs. Education and Urban Society.
54. Gould, E. (2007). Social justice in music education: The problematic of democracy. Music Education Research, 9(2), 229-240.Social justice in music education: The problematic of democracy. Music Education Research 9:229–240.
55. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Releasing the imagination.
56. Guetzkow, J. (2002). How the arts impact communities: An introduction to the literature on arts impact studies [Working Paper Series 20]. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/culturalpolicy/workpap/WP20%20-%20Guetzkow.pdf http://www.princeton.edu/culturalpolicy/workpap/WP20%20-%20Guetzkow.pdf
57. Hall, S. (1992). The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 185-227). Cambridge, UK: Polity.Formations of modernity, pp 185–227.
58. Hamm, B., & Smandych, R. C. (2005). Cultural imperialism: Essays on the political economy of cultural domination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Cultural imperialism: Essays on the political economy of cultural domination.
59. Harland, J. (2001). What research in the United Kingdom shows about transfer from the arts. In E. Winner & L. Hetland (Eds.), Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes (pp. 49-54). Los Angeles: The Getty Center.Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes, pp 49–54.
60. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York: Teachers College Press.Studio thinking: The real benefits of visual arts education.
61. Holloway, D., & Krensky, B. (2001). Introduction: The arts, urban education, and social change [Special issue]. Education and Urban Society, 33(4), 354-365.Introduction: The arts, urban education, and social change [Special issue]. Education and Urban Society 33:354–365.
62. hooks, b. (1995). Art on my mind: Visual politics. New York: New Press.Art on my mind: Visual politics.
63. Hughes, R. (1982). The shock of the new [Documentary]. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.The shock of the new.
64. Israel, D. (2009). Staying in school: Arts education and New York City high school graduate rates; A report by the Center for Arts Education. New York: Center for Arts Education. Retrieved from http://www.caenyc.org/Staying-in-School/Arts-and-Graduation-Report http://www.caenyc.org/Staying-in-School/Arts-and-Graduation-Report
65. Jensen, E. (2001). Arts with the brain in mind. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Arts with the brain in mind.
66. Kamhi, M. (2004). Rescuing art from visual culture studies. Arts Education Policy Review, 106(1), 25-31.Rescuing art from visual culture studies. Arts Education Policy Review 106:25–31.
67. Koza, J. E. (2006). “Save the music?” Toward culturally relevant, joyful, and sustainable school music. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 14(1), 23-38.“Save the music?” Toward culturally relevant, joyful, and sustainable school music. Philosophy of Music Education Review 14:23–38.
68. Mantie, R. (2008). Getting unstuck: The One World Youth Arts Project, the music education paradigm, and youth without advantage. Music Education Research, 10(4), 473-483.Getting unstuck: The One World Youth Arts Project, the music education paradigm, and youth without advantage. Music Education Research 10:473–483.
69. Miga, E., Burger, K., Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2000). Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3-4), 91-106.Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education 34:91–106.
70. Mirón, L. (2003). Cognitive transfer and art education: A critique. Arts Education Policy Review, 104(3), 29-35.Cognitive transfer and art education: A critique. Arts Education Policy Review 104:29–35.
71. Neelands, J. (2004). Miracles are happening. Abingdon, UK: Carfax.Miracles are happening.
72. Nochlin, L. (1973). “Why have there been no great women artists?” In T. B. Hess & E. Baker (Eds.), Art and sexual politics: Why have there been no great women artists? (pp. 1-43). London: Collier Books.Art and sexual politics: Why have there been no great women artists? pp 1–43.
73. Pollock, M. (2008). From shallow to deep: Toward a thorough cultural analysis of school achievement patterns. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39(4), 369-380.From shallow to deep: Toward a thorough cultural analysis of school achievement patterns. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 39:369–380.
74. Ramsey, T., & Rentschler, R. (2005). Toward a new understanding of the social impact of the arts. In AIMAC 2005: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Arts and Cultural Management. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30014382 http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30014382
75. Reimer, B. (2009). Seeking the significance of music education: Essays and reflections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Seeking the significance of music education: Essays and reflections.
76. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Orientalism.
77. Said, E. (1994). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.Culture and imperialism.
78. Shapiro, S. (Ed.). (1998). Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education.
79. Siegesmund, R. (1998). Why do we teach art today? Conceptions of art education and their justification. Studies in Art Education, 39(3), 197-214.Why do we teach art today? Conceptions of art education and their justification. Studies in Art Education 39:197–214.
80. Smithrim, K., & Upitis, R. (2005). Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1/2), 109-127.Learning through the arts: Lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education 28:109–127.
81. Spivak, G. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.A critique of postcolonial reason.
82. Steiner, G. (1998). Language and silence: Essay on language, literature, and the inhuman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Originally published 1958.Language and silence: Essay on language, literature, and the inhuman.
83. Tavin, K. M. (2003). Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 197-213.Wrestling with angels, searching for ghosts: Toward a critical pedagogy of visual culture. Studies in Art Education 44:197–213.
84. UNESCO (2006). Road map for arts education. New York: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/arts-education/official-texts/road-map/ http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/arts-education/official-texts/road-map/
85. Weiss, C., & Lichtenstein, A. (2008). AIMPrint: New relationships in the arts and learning. Chicago: Columbia College.AIMPrint: New relationships in the arts and learning.
86. West, C. (1990). The new cultural politics of difference. In R. Ferguson, M. Gever, T. Minhha, & C. West (Eds.), Out there: Marginalization and contemporary culture (pp. 19-36). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press; New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.Out there: Marginalization and contemporary culture, pp 19–36.
87. Willis, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young.
88. Willis, P. (1998). Notes on common culture: Towards a grounded aesthetic. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 163-176.Notes on common culture: Towards a grounded aesthetic. European Journal of Cultural Studies 1:163–176.
89. Winner, E. (2001). The relationship between arts and academic achievement: No evidence (yet) for a causal relationship: A summary of a meta-analytic study. In E. Winner & L. Hetland (Eds.), Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes (pp. 17-31). Los Angeles: The Getty Center.Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes, pp 17–31.
90. Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2000). The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3-4), 3-10.The arts in education: Evaluating the evidence for a causal link. Journal of Aesthetic Education 34:3–10.
91. Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (Eds.). (2001). Beyond the soundbite: Arts education and academic outcomes. Adobe Digital Editions version. Retrieved from http://www.getty.edu/foundation/pdfs/soundbite.pdf http://www.getty.edu/foundation/pdfs/soundbite.pdf
92. Winner, E., & Hetland, L. (2007). Art for our sake: School arts classes matter more than ever—but not for the reasons you think. Arts Education Policy Review, 109(5), 29-31.Art for our sake: School arts classes matter more than ever—but not for the reasons you think. Arts Education Policy Review 109:29–31.
93. Wolff, J. (1995). Against sociological imperialism: The limits of sociology in the aesthetic sphere. In R. W. Neperud (Ed.), Content, community and context in art education: Beyond postmodernism (pp. 128-140). New York: Teachers College Press.Content, community and context in art education: Beyond postmodernism, pp 128–140.
94. Zolberg, V. (1990). Constructing a sociology of culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Constructing a sociology of culture.