Variations in State SAT Performance: Meaningful or Misleading?

References

1. Alexander, K. L., Pallas, A. M., & Cook, M. A. (1981). Measure for measure: On the use of ability data in school-process research. American Sociological Review, 46, 619-631.Measure for measure: On the use of ability data in school-process research. American Sociological Review 46:619–631.
2. Alexander, K. L., & Griffin, L. J. (1976). School district effects on academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 41, 144-152.School district effects on academic achievement. American Sociological Review 41:144–152.
3. Beckwith, J. (1983). Gender and math performance: Does biology have implications for social policy? Journal of Education, 165, 158-174.Gender and math performance: Does biology have implications for social policy. Journal of Education 165:158–174.
4. Benbow, C., & Stanley, J. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264.Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact. Science 210:1262–1264.
5. Bidwell, C. E., & Kasarda, J. D. (1975). School district organization and student achievement. American Sociological Review, 40, 51-70.School district organization and student achievement. American Sociological Review 40:51–70.
6. Bills, D. (1977). An analysis of the decline in ACT college admission scores. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
7. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J. M., Mord, A., Weinfield, F., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office.Equality of educational opportunity.
8. Coleman, J., Hoffer, T. & Kilgore, S. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and other schools compared. New York: Basic Books.High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and other schools compared.
9. College Entrance Examination Board (1982). National report on college-bound seniors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Donlon, T. F. (1973). Content factors in sex differences. Research Monograph (No. 73-M). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Research Monograph (No. 73-M). Princeton. Content factors in sex differences.
11. Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412-427.Homicide and a regional culture of violence. American Sociological Review 36:412–427.
12. Hansen, J. (1984, March 18). Georgia trails entire South in school reform. Atlanta Journal and Constitution, pp. 1, 12-13.
13. Hansen, J. (1983, October 26). State studies plan to improve SAT scores. Atlanta Constitution, p. 10.
14. Heyns, B., & Hilton, T. L. (1982). The cognitive tests for high school and beyond. Sociology of Education, 55, 89-102.The cognitive tests for high school and beyond. Sociology of Education 55:89–102.
15. Jencks, C., & Crouse, J. (1982). Should we relabel the SAT . . . or replace it? Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 659-663.Should we relabel the SAT . . or replace it? Phi Delta Kappan 63:659–663.
16. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heynes, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality. New York: Harper & Row.Inequality.
17. Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement. Harvard Educational Review 39:1–123.
18. Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.Bias in mental testing.
19. Johnson, P., & Stewart, S. A. (1984, January 6). States make school dollars count: The toprated systems credit involved parents. USA Today, p. 7A.
20. Jones, L. (1981). Achievement test scores in mathematics and science. Science, 212, 412-416.Achievement test scores in mathematics and science. Science 212:412–416.
21. Kagan, J. (1977). The child in the family. Daedulus, 106, 33-56.The child in the family. Daedulus 106:33–56.
22. Loftin, C., & Hill, R. A. (1974). Regional subculture and homicide: An explanation of the Gastil-Hackney thesis. American Sociological Review, 39, 714-724.Regional subculture and homicide: An explanation of the Gastil-Hackney thesis. American Sociological Review 39:714–724.
23. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.The psychology of sex differences.
24. Mayfield, M. (1984, January 6). Educators call for "equalization program." USA Today, p. 7A.
25. McCall, N., & Hansen, J. (1984, June 13). New SAT data upgrades rank of top Georgians. Atlanta Constitution, p. 12.
26. Mercy, J. A., & Steelman, L. C. (1982). Familial influence on the intellectual attainment of children. American Sociological Review, 47, 532-542.Familial influence on the intellectual attainment of children. American Sociological Review 47:532–542.
27. Messner, S. F. (1983). Regional and racial effects on the urban homicide rate: The subculture of violence revisited. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 997-1007.Regional and racial effects on the urban homicide rate: The subculture of violence revisited. American Journal of Sociology 88:997–1007.
28. Nairn, A., & Associates (1980). The reign of ETS: The corporation that makes up minds. Washington, DC: Ralph Nader.
29. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30. Noell, J. (1982). Public and Catholic schools: A reanalysis of "public and private" schools. Sociology of Education, 55, 123-136.Public and Catholic schools: A reanalysis of "public and private" schools. Sociology of Education 55:123–136.
31. Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1983). Equity and the LSAT. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 32-45.Equity and the LSAT. Harvard Educational Review 53:32–45.
32. Reed, J. S. (1982). One south: An ethnic approach to regional culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Press.One south: An ethnic approach to regional culture.
33. Rosser, P. (1981). Sex bias in testing. Testing Digest, 3, 1-6.Sex bias in testing. Testing Digest 3:1–6.
34. SAT scores rise. (1982, September 29). Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 29.
35. Slack, W. V., & Porter, D. (1980). The scholastic aptitude test: A critical appraisal. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 154-174.The scholastic aptitude test: A critical appraisal. Harvard Educational Review 50:154–174.
36. Southern Regional Educational Board (1984). Measuring educational progress in the south: Student achievement. Atlanta: Southern Regional Educational Board.
37. Thorndike, R. L. (1975). The relation of school achievement to differences in the backgrounds of children. In A. Purups and D. Levine (Eds.), Educational policy and international assessment: Implications of the I and A surveys of educational achievement (pp. 93-104). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.The relation of school achievement to differences in the backgrounds of children. Educational policy and international assessment: Implications of the I and A surveys of educational achievement, 93–104.
38. Tobias, S. (1978). Overcoming Math Anxiety. New York: Norton.Overcoming Math Anxiety.
39. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1982). Statistical abstracts of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40. White, D. (1981). Towards a diversified legal profession: An inquiry into the Law School Admission Test, grade inflation and current admissions policies. Berkeley, CA: Julian Richardson Associates, 1981.
41. Williams, T. S. (1983). Some issues in the standardized testing of minority students. Journal of Education, 165, 192-208.Some issues in the standardized testing of minority students. Journal of Education 165:192–208.
42. Zajonc, R. B. (1976). Family configuration and intelligence. Science, 192, 227-236.Family configuration and intelligence. Science 192:227–236.
43. Zelinsky, W. (1973). The cultural geography of the United States. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallThe cultural geography of the United States.