Book Reviews

References

1. Biemiller, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 6, 75-96.The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly 6:75–96.
2. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain.
3. Chall, J.S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Learning to read. The great debate.
4. Copperman, P. (1979). The literacy hoax. New York: Morrow.The literacy hoax.
5. Frederiksen, C.H. (1977, March). Inference and the structure of children's discourse. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Development of Processing Skills, at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.
6. Gates, A.I. (1947). The improvement of reading. New York: Macmillan.The improvement of reading.
7. Gray, W.S. (1925). Reading activities in school and in social life (pp. 1-8). Essential objectives of instruction in reading (pp. 9-19). A modern program of reading instruction for the grades and for the high school (pp. 21-73). In 24th yearbook of the NSSE: Report of the National Committee on Reading: Part I. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
8. Gray, W.S. (1937). The nature and types of reading (pp. 23-40). The nature and organization of basic instruction in reading (pp. 65-132). In 36th yearbook of the NSSE: The teaching of reading: A second report: Part I. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing.
9. Ilg, F.I., & Ames, L.B. (1950). Developmental trends in reading behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 76, 261-312.Developmental trends in reading behavior. Journal of Genetic Psychology 76:261–312.
10. Kid-vid: What TV does to kids. (1977, February 21). Newsweek, pp. 63-70.
11. Lapp, D., & Flood, J. (1978). Teaching reading to every child. New York: Macmillan.Teaching reading to every child.
12. Mander, J. (1977). Four arguments for the elimination of television. New York: Morrow.Four arguments for the elimination of television.
13. National Commission on Excellence in Education (1981). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Rozin, P., & Gleitman, L. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading, II. In A.S. Reber & D.I. Scarborough (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.The structure and acquisition of reading, II. Toward a psychology of reading.
15. Russell, D.H. (1949). Reading and child development. In 48th yearbook of the NSSE: Reading in the elementary school: Part II (pp. 11-32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Reading and child development. 48th yearbook of the NSSE: Reading in the elementary school, 11–32.
16. Russell, D.H. (1949). Children learn to read. Boston: Ginn.Children learn to read. Boston.
17. Sizer, T.R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.
18. Thorndike, E.L., Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 323-332.Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 8:323–332.
19. Trabasso, T. (1972). Mental operations in language comprehension. In J.B. Carroll & R.D. Freedle (Eds.) Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, DC: Winston.Mental operations in language comprehension. Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge.
20. Winn, M. (1972). The plug-in drug New York: Viking.The plug-in drug.
21. Barrs, M. (1983). The new orthodoxy about writing: Confusing process and pedagogy. Language Arts, 60, 829-840.The new orthodoxy about writing: Confusing process and pedagogy. Language Arts 60:829–840.
22. Burrows, A., Ferebee, J. D., Jackson, D. C., & Saunders, D. O. (1964). They all want to write(3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.They all want to write. They all want to write.
23. Cott, J. (1983, April 4). Profiles: Finding out is better. New Yorker, p. 47ff.
24. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.The composing processes of twelfth graders.
25. Emig, J. (1975). The biology of writing: Another view of the process. In P. J. Finn & W. T. Petty (Eds.), The writing processes of students (pp. 11-20). Buffalo: State University of New York.The biology of writing: Another view of the process. The writing processes of students, 11–20.
26. Graves, D. H. (1973). Children's writing: Research directions and hypotheses based upon an examination of the writing processes of seven-year-old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
27. Graves, D. H. (1981). Final report: A case study observing the development of primary children's composing spelling and motor behaviors during the writing process. Durham: University of New Hampshire.Final report: A case study observing the development of primary children's composing spelling and motor behaviors during the writing process.
28. Graves, D. H. (1983). Teacher intervention in children's writing: A response to Myra Barrs. Language Arts, 60, 841-846.Teacher intervention in children's writing: A response to Myra Barrs. Language Arts 60:841–846.
29. Opie, I., & Opie, P. (1959). The lore and language of school children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.The lore and language of school children.
30. Smith, F. (1981). Myths of writing. Language Arts, 58, 792-798.Myths of writing. Language Arts 58:792–798.