Communities and Schools: A New View of Urban Education Reform

References

1. Abrams, L. S., & Gibbs, J. T. (2000). Planning for school change: School-community collaboration in a full-service elementary school. Urban Education, 35(1), 79–103.Planning for school change: School-community collaboration in a full-service elementary school. Urban Education 35:79–103.
2. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform.
3. Baum, H. S. (2003). Community action for school reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.Community action for school reform.
4. Blanc, S., Brown, J., Nevarez-La Torre, A., & Brown, C. (2002). Case study: Logan Square Neighborhood Association. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.Case study: Logan Square Neighborhood Association.
5. Blank, M. J., Melaville, A., & Shah, B. (2003). Making the difference: Research and practice in community schools. Washington, DC: Coalition for Community Schools.
6. Briggs, X. d. S., & Mueller, E. J. (1997). From neighborhood to community: Evidence on the social effects of community development. New York: New School for Social Research, Community Development Research Center.
7. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.
8. Bryk, A. S. (2003). No child left behind, Chicago-style. In P. E. Peterson & M. R. West (Eds.), No child left behind: The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 242–268).Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.No child left behind, Chicago-style. No child left behind: The politics and practice of school accountability.
9. Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Dumping in Dixie: Race, class and environmental quality.
10. Camino Nuevo Charter Academy. (2004). Elementary school accountability report card 2002–2003. Retrieved November 2, 2004, from www.caminonuevo.org www.caminonuevo.org
11. Chambers, E. (1978). Organizing for family and congregation. Franklyn Park, NY: Industrial Areas Foundation.Organizing for family and congregation.
12. Children's Aid Society. (2001). Building a community school (3rd ed.). New York: Author.
13. Chung, C. (2002). Using public schools as community-development tools: Strategies for communitybased developers. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University and Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation.Using public schools as community-development tools: Strategies for communitybased developers.
14. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement), S95–S120.Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement):S95–S120.
15. Cookson, P. W., Jr., & Berger, K. (2002). Expert miracles: Charter schools and the politics of hope and despair. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Expert miracles: Charter schools and the politics of hope and despair.
16. Cortes, E., Jr. (1993). Reweaving the fabric: The Iron Rule and the IAF strategy for power and politics. In H. G. Cisneros (Ed.), Interwoven destinies (pp. 294–319). New York: W. W. Norton.Reweaving the fabric: The Iron Rule and the IAF strategy for power and politics. Interwoven destinies, 294–319.
17. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280–298.The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review 58:280–298.
18. Dewey, J. (1915). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.The school and society.
19. Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2001). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twentyfirst century. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Place matters: Metropolitics for the twentyfirst century.
20. Driscoll, M. E. (2001). The sense of place and the neighborhood school: Implications for building social capital and for community development. In R. L. Crowson (Ed.), Community development and school reform (vol. 5, pp. 19–42). Amsterdam: JAI.The sense of place and the neighborhood school: Implications for building social capital and for community development. Community development and school reform.
21. Dryfoos, J. (2002). Full-service community schools: Creating new institutions. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 393–399.Full-service community schools: Creating new institutions. Phi Delta Kappan 83:393–399.
22. Dryfoos, J. (2003a). Evaluation of community schools: Findings to date. Retrieved April 20, 2005, from www.communityschools.org/evaluation/eval1.html www.communityschools.org/evaluation/eval1.html
23. Dryfoos, J. (2003b). The Quitman Street Community School: 1998–2003 Five year report. Newark, NJ: Prudential Foundation.
24. Dryfoos, J., & Maguire, S. (2002). Inside full-service community schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25. Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Consequences of growing up poor.
26. Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27. Fantini, M., Gittell, M., & Magat, R. (1970). Community control and the urban school. New York: Praeger.Community control and the urban school.
28. Farbstein, J. (2003). Creative community building: 2003 Rudy Bruner Award for Urban Excellence. Retrieved April 20, 2005, from http://www.brunerfoundation.org/rba/book 2003/1-2003.pdf http://www.brunerfoundation.org/rba/book 2003/1-2003.pdf
29. Fausset, R. (2004, July 12). Thousands attend parley to improve life in county. Los Angeles Times, p. B3.Thousands attend parley to improve life in county. Los Angeles Times, B3.
30. Fine, M. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94, 682–710.
31. Finn, C. E. J., Manno, B. V., & Vanourek, G. (2001). Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Charter schools in action: Renewing public education.
32. Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1997). Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 549–560.Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate. American Behavioral Scientist 40:549–560.
33. Gold, E., Simon, E., & Brown, C. (2002a). Case study: Oakland community organizations. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.Case study: Oakland community organizations.
34. Gold, E., Simon, E., & Brown, C. (2002b). Successful community organizing for school reform. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.Successful community organizing for school reform.
35. Goldring, E. B. (1990). Elementary school principals as boundary spanners: Their engagement with parents. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(1), 53–62.Elementary school principals as boundary spanners: Their engagement with parents. Journal of Educational Administration 28:53–62.
36. Halpern, R. (1995). Rebuilding the inner city: A history of neighborhood initiatives to address poverty in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.Rebuilding the inner city: A history of neighborhood initiatives to address poverty in the United States.
37. Horwitt, S. D. (1989). Let them call me rebel: Saul Alinsky, his life and legacy. New York: Knopf.Let them call me rebel: Saul Alinsky, his life and legacy.
38. Keith, N. Z. (1995). The community in the school: Can we create community across difference? Educational Horizons, 73, 169–173.The community in the school: Can we create community across difference? Educational Horizons 73:169–173.
39. Keith, N. Z. (1996). Can urban school reform and community development be joined? The potential of community schools. Education and Urban Society, 28, 237–268.Can urban school reform and community development be joined? The potential of community schools. Education and Urban Society 28:237–268.
40. Keith, N. Z. (1999). Whose community schools? New discourses, old patterns. Theory Into Practice, 38, 225–234.Whose community schools? New discourses, old patterns. Theory Into Practice 38:225–234.
41. Khadduri, J., Turnham, J., Chase, A., & Schwartz, H. (2003). Case studies exploring the potential relationship between schools and neighborhood revitalization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Case studies exploring the potential relationship between schools and neighborhood revitalization.
42. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools.
43. Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms.
44. Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education.
45. Lareau, A., & Horvat, E. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 37–53.Moments of social inclusion and exclusion: Race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education 72:37–53.
46. Lavine, R. (1997). School finance reform in Texas, 1983–1995. In R. H. Wilson (Ed.), Public policy and community: Activism and governance in Texas (pp. 119–165). Austin: University of Texas Press.School finance reform in Texas, 1983–1995. Public policy and community: Activism and governance in Texas, 119–165.
47. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1978). Worlds apart: Relationships between families and schools. New York: Basic Books.Worlds apart: Relationships between families and schools.
48. Loomer, B. (1976). Two conceptions of power. Criterion, 15(1), 11–29.Two conceptions of power. Criterion 15:11–29.
49. Mediratta, K. (2004). Constituents of change: Community organizations and public education reform. New York: New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy.Constituents of change: Community organizations and public education reform.
50. Mediratta, K., & Fruchter, N. (2003). From governance to accountability: Building relationships that make schools work. New York: New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy.From governance to accountability: Building relationships that make schools work.
51. Mediratta, K., Fruchter, N., & Lewis, A. C. (2002). Organizing for school reform: How communities are finding their voices and reclaiming their public schools (A report). New York: New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
52. Melaville, A. (2004). Doing what matters: The Bridges to Success strategy for building community schools. Indianapolis: United Way of Central Indiana, Bridges to Success.Doing what matters: The Bridges to Success strategy for building community schools.
53. Merseth, K. K., Schorr, L. B., & Elmore, R. F. (2000). Schools, community-based interventions, and children's learning and development: What's the connect? In M. C. Wang & W. L. Boyd (Eds.), Improving results for children and families: Linking collaborative services with school reform efforts (pp. 35–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Schools, community-based interventions, and children's learning and development: What's the connect? Improving results for children and families: Linking collaborative services with school reform efforts, 35–51.
54. Merz, C., & Furman, G. (1997). Community and schools: Promise and paradox. New York: Teachers College Press.Community and schools: Promise and paradox.
55. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice 31:132–141.
56. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Digest of education statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
57. National Center for Schools and Communities. (2002a). From schoolhouse to statehouse: Community organizing for public school reform. New York: Fordham University, National Center for Schools and Communities.
58. National Center for Schools and Communities. (2002b). Unlocking the schoolhouse door: The community struggle for a say in our children's education. New York: Fordham University, National Center for Schools and Communities.
59. Noguera, P. (1996). Confronting the urban in urban school reform. Urban Review, 28(1), 1–27.Confronting the urban in urban school reform. Urban Review 28:1–27.
60. Noguera, P. (2001). Transforming urban schools through investments in the social capital of parents. In S. Saegert, J. P. Thompson, & M. R. Warren (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities (pp. 189–212). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Transforming urban schools through investments in the social capital of parents. Social capital and poor communities, 189–212.
61. Noguera, P. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York: Teachers College Press.City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education.
62. Payne, C. M., & Kaba, M. (n.d.). So much reform, so little change: Building-level obstacles to urban school reform. Unpublished manuscript.
63. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6:65–78.
64. Reese, W. J. (2002). Power and the promise of urban school reform: Grassroots movements during the Progressive Era. New York: Teachers College Press.Power and the promise of urban school reform: Grassroots movements during the Progressive Era.
65. Rioux, J. W., & Berla, N. (1993). Innovations in parent and family involvement. Princeton Junction, NJ: Eye on Education.Innovations in parent and family involvement.
66. Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Class and schools: Using social, economic and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap.
67. Sarason, S. B. (1995). Parent involvement and the political principle: Why the existing governance structure of schools should be abolished. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Schorr, J. (2002). Hard lessons: The promise of an inner city charter school. New York: Ballantine Books.
69. Schrag, P. (2003). Final test: The battle for adequacy in America's schools. New York: New Press.Final test: The battle for adequacy in America's schools.
70. Shirley, D. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.Community organizing for urban school reform.
71. Shirley, D. (2002). Valley Interfaith and school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.Valley Interfaith and school reform.
72. Simon, E., & Gold, E. (2002). Case study: Austin interfaith. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.Case study: Austin interfaith.
73. Smrekar, C. E. (1996). The impact of school choice and community: In the interest of families and schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.The impact of school choice and community: In the interest of families and schools.
74. Smrekar, C. E., & Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Integrated services: Challenges in linking schools, families and communities. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 443–461). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Squires, G. D. (1994). Capital and communities in Black and White: The intersections of race, class and uneven development. Albany: State University of New York Press.Capital and communities in Black and White: The intersections of race, class and uneven development.
76. Stone, C., Doherty, K., Jones, C., & Ross, T. (1999). Schools and disadvantaged neighborhoods: The community development challenge. In R. F. Ferguson & W. T. Dickens (Eds.), Urban problems and community development (pp. 339–380). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Schools and disadvantaged neighborhoods: The community development challenge. Urban problems and community development, 339–380.
77. Stone, C. N., Henig, J. R., Jones, B. D., & Pierannunzi, C. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools.
78. Texas Interfaith Education Fund. (2004). Education conference discussion paper. Austin: Author.
79. Warren, M. R. (1998). Community building and political power: A community organizing approach to democratic renewal. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(September), 78–92.Community building and political power: A community organizing approach to democratic renewal. American Behavioral Scientist 41:78–92.
80. Warren, M. R. (2001). Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalize American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalize American democracy.
81. Warren, M. R., Thompson, J. P., & Saegert, S. (2001). The role of social capital in combating poverty. In S. Saegert, J. P. Thompson, & M. R. Warren (Eds.), Social capital and poor communities (pp. 1–28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press.The role of social capital in combating poverty. Social capital and poor communities, 1–28.
82. Warren, M. R., & Wood, R. L. (2001). Faith based community organizing: The state of the field. Jericho, NY: Interfaith Funders.Faith based community organizing: The state of the field.
83. Wells, A. S. (2002). Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity. New York: Teachers College Press.Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity.
84. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society 27:151–208.