Accountability and School Performance: Implications from Restructuring Schools

References

1. Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.Cultural politics and education.
2. Bettveniste, G. (1985). The design of school accountability systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7, 261-279.The design of school accountability systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 7:261–279.
3. Berends, M., & King, M. B. (1994). A description of restructuring in nationally nominated schools: Legacy of the iron cage? Educational Policy, 8(1), 28-50.
4. Bryk, A. S. (1996). Lessons from Catholic high schools on renewing our educational institutions. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Restructuring schools: Promising practices and policies (pp. 81-98). New York: Plenum Press.Lessons from Catholic high schools on renewing our educational institutions. Restructuring schools: Promising practices and policies, 81–98.
5. Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Catholic schools and the common good.
6. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
7. Clune, W. E. (1993). The best path to systemic educational policy: Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 233-254.The best path to systemic educational policy: Standard/centralized or differentiated/decentralized. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15:233–254.
8. Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11-17, 31.What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher 24:11–17, 31.
9. Cohen, D. K. (1996). Rewarding teachers for student performance. In S. Fuhrman & J. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 60-112). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Rewarding teachers for student performance. Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work, 60–112.
10. Committee for Economic Development (1985). Investing in our children. Washington, DC: Author.
11. Corcoran, T., & Goertz, M. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 27-31.Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher 24:27–31.
12. Consortium on Productivity in the Schools. (1995). Using what we have to get the. schools we need: A productivity focus for American education. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Accountability and teacher professionalism. American Educator, 12(4), 8-13, 38-43.
14. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Standards of practice for learner-centered schools. New York; Columbia University, Teachers College, National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching.Standards of practice for learner-centered schools.
15. Darling-Hammond, L. (1993). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 753-761.Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan 74:753–761.
16. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). National standards and assessments: Will they improve education? American Journal of Education, 102, 478-510.National standards and assessments: Will they improve education. American Journal of Education 102:478–510.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (1995). Policy for restructuring. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from, the ground up (pp. 157-175). New York: Teachers College Press.Policy for restructuring. The work of restructuring schools: Building from, the ground up, 157–175.
18. David, J. (1994). Transforming stale education agencies to support education reform. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.Transforming stale education agencies to support education reform.
19. Fine, M. (1994). Chartering urban school reform: Reflections on public high schools in the midst of change. New York: Teachers College Press.Chartering urban school reform: Reflections on public high schools in the midst of change.
20. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform.. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform..
21. Fuhrman, S. H., Elmore, R. F., & Massell, D. (1993). School reform in the United States: Putting it into context. In S. L. Jacobson & R. Berne (Eds.), Reforming education: The emerging systemic approach (pp. 3-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22. Grossman, P., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-11, 23.Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher 24:5–11, 23.
23. Hanushek, E. A. (1994). Making schools work: Improving performance and controlling costs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Making schools work: Improving performance and controlling costs.
24. Hopfenberg, W. S., Levin, H. M., & Associates. (1993). The accelerated resource guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.The accelerated resource guide.
25. Johnson, J., & Immerwahr, J. (1994). First things first; What Americans expect from the public schools. A report from Public Agenda. New York: Public Agenda.
26. Johnson, J., Arkas, S., Friedman, W., Immerwahr, J., & Bers, A. (1995). Assignment incomplete: The unfinished business of education reform. A report from Public Agenda. New York: Public Agenda.
27. Kearns, D. T., & Doyle, D. P. (1988). Winning the brain race: A bold plan to make our schools competitive. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Winning the brain race: A bold plan to make our schools competitive.
28. Kelly, C., & Odden, A. (1995). Reinventing teacher compensation systems. In CPRE Finance Briefs: Reporting on issues and research in education finance. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
29. Kirst, M. (1990). Accountability: Implications for state and local policymakers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Information Services.
30. Lawler. E. E., III. (1991). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.High-involvement management.
31. Lawler, E. E., III. (1992). The ultimate advantage: Creating the high involvement organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.The ultimate advantage: Creating the high involvement organization.
32. Lee, V., Bryk, A., & Smith, J. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171-267.
33. Levin, H. M. (1974). A conceptual framework for accountability in education. School Review, 82, 363-391.A conceptual framework for accountability in education. School Review 82:363–391.
34. Lieberman, A. (Ed.). (1995). The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up. New York: Teachers College Press.The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up.
35. Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.
36. Maeroff, G. I. (1988). The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence. New York: Teachers College Press.The empowerment of teachers: Overcoming the crisis of confidence.
37. McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9:133–152.
38. McLaughlin, M. W., Talbert, J. E., & Bascia, N. (Eds.). (1990). The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: 'Teachers' realities. New York: Teachers College Press.The contexts of teaching in secondary schools: 'Teachers' realities.
39. McLaughlin, M. W., & Shepard, L. A., with O'Day, J. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-Based Education Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Academy of Education.
40. Mohrman, S. A., Wohlstetter, P., & Associates. (1994). School-based management: Organizing for high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.School-based management: Organizing for high performance.
41. Muncey, D., & McQuillan, P. J. (1993). Education reform as revitalization movement. American Journal of Education, 101, 393-431.Education reform as revitalization movement. American Journal of Education 101:393–431.
42. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43. National Education Goals Panel. (1991). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44. Newmann, F. M. (1993a). What is a restructured school? Principal, 72(3), 5-8.What is a restructured school? Principal 72:5–8.
45. Newmann, F. M. (1993b). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 4-13, 22.Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher 22:4–13, 22.
46. Newmann, F. M., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality.
47. Newmann, F. M., Secada, W. G., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and achievement: Visions, standards, and. scoring. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.A guide to authentic instruction and achievement: Visions, standards, and. scoring.
48. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
49. O'Day, J., Goertz, M. E., & Floden, R. E. (1995). Building capacity for education reform. In CPRE Policy Briefs: Reporting on issues and research in education policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
50. O'Day, J., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In H. S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 250-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Systemic reform and educational opportunity. Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system, 250–312.
51. Powell, A. G., Farrar. F.., & Cohen, D. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace.
52. Research and Policy Committee. (1994). Pulling learning first: Governing and managing the schools for high achievement. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development.
53. Rothman, R. (1995). Measuring up: Standards, assessment and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Measuring up: Standards, assessment and school reform.
54. Rubenstein, M., Hammer, R., & Adelman, N. (1992). Minnesota's Open Enrollment Option. Washington, DC: Policy Study Associates.Minnesota's Open Enrollment Option.
55. Schrag, F. (1995). Back to basics: Fundamental educational questions reexamined. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Back to basics: Fundamental educational questions reexamined.
56. Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools.
57. Sizer, T. R. (1985). Horace's compromise (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Horace's compromise.
58. Smith, M. S., & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 233-267). London: Falmer Press.Systemic school reform. The politics of curriculum and testing: The 1990 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association, 233–267.
59. Talbert, J. E., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1994). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. American Journal of Education, 102, 123–153.Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. American Journal of Education 102:123–153.
60. Wehlage, G. G., Osthoff, E., & Porter, A. (1996). Support from external agencies. In F. M. Newmann & Associates, Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 264-285). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61. Wohlstetter, P., Smyer, R., & Mohrman, S. A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 268-286.New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16:268–286.