The Federal Role in Educational Improvement

References

1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. Block grants: A comparative analysis (A-60). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.
2. Anderson, R. B., St. Pierre, R. G., Proper, E. C., & Stebbins, L. B. Pardon us, but what was the question again? Response to the critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 1978, 48, 161-170.Pardon us, but what was the question again? Response to the critique of the Follow Through evaluation. Harvard Educational Review 48:161–170.
3. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. 7:Implementing and sustaining innovations (R-1589/8-HEW). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978.Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. 7:Implementing and sustaining innovations (R-1589/8-HEW).
4. Boruch, R. F., Cordray, D. S., Pion, G., & Leviton, L. An appraisal of educational program evaluations: Federal, state, and local agencies Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University, 1980.An appraisal of educational program evaluations: Federal, state, and local agencies.
5. Carroll, M., Clark, D., Huff, A., & Lotto, L. New perspectives on planning in educational organizations. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory, 1981.New perspectives on planning in educational organizations.
6. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C, Walker, D. F., & Weiner, S. S. Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1980.Toward reform of program evaluation.
7. David, J. L. Local uses of Title I evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981, 3, 27-39.Local uses of Title I evaluations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 3:27–39.
8. Edelfelt, R. A., & Lawrence, G. In-service education: The state of the art. In R. A. Lawrence and M.Johnson (Eds.), Rethinking in-service education. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1975.
9. Education Times. The author of block grant legislation talks about the new education law. August 10, 1981, p. 2.
10. Emrick, J. A. Evaluation of the National Diffusion Network Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute, 1977.Evaluation of the National Diffusion Network.
11. Glennan, T. K., Jr., Hederman, W. F., Jr., Johnson, L. L., & Rettig, R. A. The role of demonstrations in federal R&D policy (R-2288-OTA). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978.The role of demonstrations in federal R&D policy (R-2288-OTA).
12. House, E. R. The politics of educational innovation Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1974.The politics of educational innovation.
13. Kennedy, M. M., Apling, R., & Neumann, W. F. The role of evaluation and test information in public schools Cambridge, Mass.: Huron Institute, 1980.The role of evaluation and test information in public schools.
14. Louis, K. S., Rosenblum, S., & Molitor, J. A. Strategies for knowledge use and school improvement Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Associates, 1981.Strategies for knowledge use and school improvement.
15. Mann, D. The politics of training teachers in schools. Teachers College Record, 1976, 77, 323-338.The politics of training teachers in schools. Teachers College Record 77:323–338.
16. McLaughlin, M. W. Evaluation and reform: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965/Title I Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1975.Evaluation and reform: The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965/Title I.
17. National Council on Educational Research. Reflections and recommendations: Fourth annual report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education, 1978.
18. National Science Foundation. Pre-college science curriculum activities of the National Science Foundation (Vol. 2). Washington, D. C : Author, 1975.
19. Pelavin, S. H., Hayward, B.J., & Pelavin, D. An evaluation of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education. Durham, N. C : NTS Research Corporation, 1980.An evaluation of the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
20. Perloff, E. Project Impact: A pilot study evaluating the NDEA summer institute program. Final report. Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, 1970.Project Impact: A pilot study evaluating the NDEA summer institute program. Final report.
21. Pincus, J. (Ed.). Educational evaluation in the public policy setting (R-2502-RC). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1980.Educational evaluation in the public policy setting (R-2502-RC).
22. Reynolds, M. C. (Ed.). National technical assistance systems in special education. Minneapolis: Leadership Training Institute/Special Education, University of Minnesota, 1975.National technical assistance systems in special education.
23. Rivlin, A. M. Systematic thinking for social action Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1971.Systematic thinking for social action.
24. Rivlin, A. M., & Timpane, P. M. (Eds.). Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1975.Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder?.
25. Royster, E. C, Madey, D. L., Decad, J. K., & Baker, R. F. Final report: Building capacity for improvement of education Durham, N.C.: NTS Research Corporation, 1981.Final report: Building capacity for improvement of education.
26. Schutz, R. E. The design of school improvement efforts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980, 2, 31-49.The design of school improvement efforts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2:31–49.
27. Sieber, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Metzger, L. The use of educational knowledge. Evaluation of the Pilot State Dissemination Program. New York: Columbia University, Bureau of Applied Social Research, 1972.The use of educational knowledge. Evaluation of the Pilot State Dissemination Program.
28. Stearns, M. S. Evaluation of the field test of Project Information Packages Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute and RMC Research Corporation, 1975, 1977.Evaluation of the field test of Project Information Packages.
29. Turnbull, B. J. Federal linkage alternatives Durham, N.C.: NTS Research Corporation, 1981.Federal linkage alternatives.
30. Tumbull, B. J., Thorn, L. I., & Hutchins, C. L. Promoting change in schools: A diffusion casebook. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory, 1974.Promoting change in schools: A diffusion casebook.
31. Wargo, M.J., Campeau, P. L., & Tallmadge, G. K. Further examination of exemplary programs for educating disadvantaged children. Palo Alto, Calif. : American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, 1971.Further examination of exemplary programs for educating disadvantaged children.
32. Weiss, C. H. (Ed.). Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education. Boston : Allyn & Bacon, 1972.Evaluating action programs: Readings in social action and education.
33. Wiley, D., & Harnischfeger, A. Explosion of a myth: Quality of schooling and exposure to instruction, major educational vehicles. Educational Researcher, 1974, 3, 7-12.Explosion of a myth: Quality of schooling and exposure to instruction, major educational vehicles. Educational Researcher 3:7–12.
34. Wirt, J. G. Implementing diagnostic/prescriptive reading innovations. Teachers College Record, 1976, 77, 352-365.Implementing diagnostic/prescriptive reading innovations. Teachers College Record 77:352–365.