Essay Reviews: Methodology and Epistemology: A Dialogue

References

1. Baumrind, D. (1985). Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist, 40, 165-174.Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist 40:165–174.
2. Bleier, R. (Ed.). (1986). Feminist approaches to science. New York: Pergamon Press.Feminist approaches to science.
3. Bredo, E., & Feinberg, W. (Eds.). (1982). Knowledge and values in social and educational research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Knowledge and values in social and educational research.
4. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Handbook of research on teaching, 171–246.
5. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for fields settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for fields settings.
6. Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S. (Eds.). (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills: Sage.Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research.
7. Feyerabend, P. K. (1981). Realism, rationalism and scientific method: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Realism, rationalism and scientific method: Philosophical papers 1.
8. Gage, N. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A "historical" sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A "historical" sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher 18:4–10.
9. Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.The paradigm dialog.
10. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Fourth generation evaluation.
11. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Knowledge and human interests.
12. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Communication and the evolution of society.
13. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Tavistock.Ethnography: Principles in practice.
14. Harding, J. (Ed.). (1986). Perspectives on gender and science. London: Falmer.Perspectives on gender and science.
15. Harding, S., & Hintikka, M. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science.
16. Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or, dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-18.Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or, dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher 17:10–18.
17. Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-9.Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher 19:2–9.
18. Jones, K. B., & Jonasdottir, A. G. (Eds.). (1985). The political interests of gender: Developing theory and research with a feminist face. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.The political interests of gender: Developing theory and research with a feminist face.
19. Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Reflections on gender and science.
20. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind.
21. Leplin, J. (Ed.). (1984). Scientific realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Scientific realism.
22. Light, R. J., & Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Summing up: The science of reviewing research.
23. Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). The role of ideology in naturalistic research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.Naturalistic inquiry.
25. Manicas, P. T. (1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.A history and philosophy of the social sciences.
26. Maxwell, J. A. (1978). The evolution of Plains Indian kin terminologies: A non-reflectionist account. Plain Anthropologist, 23, 13-29.The evolution of Plains Indian kin terminologies: A non-reflectionist account. Plain Anthropologist 23:13–29.
27. Maxwell, J. A., Bashook, P. G., & Sandlow, L. J. (1986). Combining ethnographic and experimental methods in educational evaluation: A case study. In D. M. Fetterman & M. A. Pitman (Eds.), Educational evaluation: Ethnography in theory, practice, and politics (pp. 121-143). Beverly Hills: Sage.Combining ethnographic and experimental methods in educational evaluation: A case study. Educational evaluation: Ethnography in theory, practice, and politics, 121–143.
28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods.
29. Millman, M., & Kanter, R. M. (Eds.). (1975). Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science. New York: Anchor Books.Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science.
30. Morgan, L. H. (1871). Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family [Special Series: Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge]. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
31. Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Macmillan.Social structure.
32. Norris, S. P. (1983). The inconsistencies at the foundation of construct validation theory. In E. R. House (Ed.), Philosophy of evaluation (pp. 53-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.The inconsistencies at the foundation of construct validation theory. Philosophy of evaluation, 53–74.
33. Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Meaning and the moral sciences.
34. Putnam, H. (1987). The many faces of realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.The many faces of realism.
35. Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a human face (J. Conant, ed). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Realism with a human face.
36. Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world.
37. Silva, E., & Slaughter, S. (1984). Serving power: The making of the academic social science expert. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Serving power: The making of the academic social science expert.
38. Strauss, A. L. (1988). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Qualitative analysis for social scientists.
39. Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.The structure of scientific theories.
40. Tuana, N. (Ed.). (1989). Feminism and science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Feminism and science.
41. Werner, O., & Schoepfle, G. M. (1987). Systematic fieldwork (Vols. 1-2). Beverly Hills: Sage.Systematic fieldwork 1-2.
42. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking — and rejecting — validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121-152). New York: Teachers College Press.On seeking — and rejecting — validity in qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate, 121–152.
43. Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Case study research: Design and methods.