States and the New Federalism

References

1. Beam, D. R., Forecasting the future of federalism: Task and challenge. In U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, The future of federalism in the 1980s: Report and papers from the Conference on the Future of Federalism (Alexandria, Va., July 25-26, 1980). Washington, D.C.: ACIR, 1981.
2. Beer, S. H. Federalism, nationalism and democracy in America. American Political Science Review, 1978, 1, pp. 9-21.Federalism, nationalism and democracy in America. American Political Science Review 1:9–21.
3. Blair, J. P., & Nachmias, D. Fiscal retrenchment and urban policy. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.Fiscal retrenchment and urban policy.
4. Derthick, M. The influence of federal grants. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970.
5. Education Daily, Oct. 7, 1981, p. 1.
6. Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. Strategic choice in federal policy: The compliance-assistance tradeoff. In A. Lieberman & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Policymaking in education (81st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
7. Gamson, W. A. The strategy of social protest Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1975.The strategy of social protest.
8. Goettel, R. J. Federal assistance to national target groups: The ESEA Title I experience. In M. Timpane (Ed.), The federal interest in financing schooling. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1978, pp. 173-208.Federal assistance to national target groups: The ESEA Title I experience. The federal interest in financing schooling, 173–208.
9. Hargrove, E. C, Graham, S. G., Ward, L. E., Abernathy, V., Cunningham, J., & Vaughn, W. K. Regulations and the schools: The implementation of equal education for handicapped children. Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, March 1981.Regulations and the schools: The implementation of equal education for handicapped children.
10. Heclo, H. Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new political system. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1980.Issue networks and the executive establishment. The new political system.
11. Kirp, D. L. Can the Democrats offer both equity and excellence? The New Republic, March 31, 1982, pp. 31-32.
12. Kirst, M., & Jung, R. The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen year view of Title I, ESEA. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980, 2(5), 17-33.The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen year view of Title I, ESEA. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 2:17–33.
13. McDonnell, L. M., & McLaughlin, M.W. Program consolidation and the state role in ESEA Title IV (R-2531-HEW). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, April 1980.
14. McDonnell, L. M., & McLaughlin, M. W. Education policy and the role of the states (R-2755-NIE). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, May 1982.
15. McLaughlin, M. W. State involvement in local educational quality Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1982.State involvement in local educational quality.
16. Murphy, J. T. Progress and problems: The paradox of state reform. In A. Lieberman & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Policymaking in education (81st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
17. Nathan, R. P., Manuel, A. D., Calkins, S. E., & Associates. Monitoring revenue sharing Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1975.Monitoring revenue sharing.
18. Pilcher, D. Sorting out the federal system. State Legislatures, February 1982, p. 10.Sorting out the federal system. State Legislatures, 10.
19. Reagan, M. D., & Sanzone, J. G. The new federalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.The new federalism.
20. Shive, G., & Thompson, C. F. How will state agencies respond to the consolidation of federal education programs? Andover, Mass.: The NETWORK, September 1981.How will state agencies respond to the consolidation of federal education programs?.
21. SRI International. Trends in the management of ESEA Title I: A perspective from compliance reviews. Menlo Park, Calif.: September 1979.
22. Thurow, L. C. Generating inequality: Mechanisms of distribution in the U.S. economy. New York: Basic Books, 1975.Generating inequality: Mechanisms of distribution in the U.S. economy.
23. "Title I Funds to School Districts," Education Daily, March 17, 1982, p. 5.
24. Turnbull, B.J., Smith, M. S., & Ginsburg, A. L. Issues for a new administration: The federal role in education. American Journal of Education, 1981, 89, 396-427.Issues for a new administration: The federal role in education. American Journal of Education 89:396–427.
25. U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. The future of federalism in the 1980s: Report and papers from the Conference on the Future of Federalism (Alexandria, Va., July 25-26, 1980). Washington, D.C.: ACIR, 1981.